Nadim Zahawi

Your stance appears to be;
1) If he'd been competent in hiding £27m from HMRC then it wouldn't be an issue.
2) He's dislikable.

If I'm wrong I apologise but this sort of compliciity, in the circumstances foisted on this country by the Conservative Party, means your moral compass is pointing fixedly on ****.

Tax avoidance is legal whether we like it or not and the tax system in this country is far too complicated for its own good.

I didn’t create the rules but understand there are legal ways to avoid tax (some border on reprehensible but many don’t, eg pension contributions) … if that makes me a **** then so be it.
 
Interesting call-in to LBC earlier from a bloke who boasts a 40 year career with HMRC as a tax investigator, who therefore knows extraordinarily well that of which he speaks. Basically, the level of the penalty imposed on , and paid by, Zahawi would indicate he is very close to the category of "deliberate but not concealed action"- very close to actual tax evasion - which would normally result in the offender being banned from holding office as a company director, etc. Which logically implies that Zahawi's position as Chair of the Conservative Party is untenable and that he should by rights resign, or be required to resign. He won't of course. Zahawi is claiming that HMRC found his actions to be in the lesser category of "careless and not deliberate".

What it points to is something that most people already know - that Zahawi is fundamentally dishonest, selfish and venal (see: threatening email to a journalist seeking to investigate his misdemeanours). Just like Johnson. Just like Rees-Mogg. Just like every other Tory shit. He shouldn't be within a million miles of public office.
 
as I said this is being teased out bit by bit - there will be more to come I bet. Saw him on BBC News just now wearing big puffer coat, baseball cap. trackies and trainers - presumably hoping to blend in with the Knightsbridge Massive as the whole ensemble was worth thousands £££££

 
Tax avoidance is legal whether we like it or not and the tax system in this country is far too complicated for its own good.

I didn’t create the rules but understand there are legal ways to avoid tax (some border on reprehensible but many don’t, eg pension contributions) … if that makes me a **** then so be it.
Once again, he tried to evade, notwithstanding @Zuriblue 's post above (we know high office will only ever face the least serious of charges they can plausibly bring).
 
We should expect our leaders to be beyond reproach, acting legally and morally to do their best for their constituents and the nation. It really isn't too much to ask: no second jobs, no positions on company boards, no offshore accounts, and any family business based in the UK and paying full UK Corporation Tax. The salary of £88k is not a discouragement for the vast majority of the UK populous, and the vast majority would not consider that they may need a second position to top up their earnings. There are too many vested interests, too many with shares in companies, and too many acting dubiously where tax affairs are concerned. The legal argument is almost a non-starter for me - do the right thing.
 
Once again, he tried to evade, notwithstanding @Zuriblue 's post above (we know high office will only ever face the least serious of charges they can plausibly bring).

It appears based on evidence posted he tried to avoid. What he appears to have ended up doing is evading. I guess it’s like a manslaughter charge…he didn’t intend to but he did. Although always hard to know how much he really did intend to.

if he had intended to evade he would be facing criminal proceedings. You can’t just say “oh ok I’ll pay it” if you’ve been busted, that’s not how it works.
 
It appears based on evidence posted he tried to avoid. What he appears to have ended up doing is evading. I guess it’s like a manslaughter charge…he didn’t intend to but he did. Although always hard to know how much he really did intend to.

if he had intended to evade he would be facing criminal proceedings. You can’t just say “oh ok I’ll pay it” if you’ve been busted, that’s not how it works.
He may well not have faced criminal proceedings, especially with the scale of defence he would likely threaten HMRC with. This is a very large payment made, suggestive of a very serious matter, but HMRC will cut deals if they are likely to end up in legal proceedings for years.
 
Tax avoidance is legal whether we like it or not and the tax system in this country is far too complicated for its own good.

I didn’t create the rules but understand there are legal ways to avoid tax (some border on reprehensible but many don’t, eg pension contributions) … if that makes me a **** then so be it.
It is complicated and allows for all kinds of manoeuvres, legal or otherwise. It is, in fact, as variable system as the offside and handball laws in football.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.