Question is if a player who finds trouble. Whether it's brought upon him or he brings it upon himself is worth it even at the highest level. If he is to aspire to the level of a Ronaldo would it matter that he is consistently involved in rows on and off the field.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri [Merged] continued.
- Thread starter svennis pennis
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
smiles said:All this talk of signing him after Arsenal's CL tie is utter BS, Mancini made it repeatedly and utterly clear he wants his targets in ASAP. Nasri was left out of this game because he is on the verge of signing for City. Like Aguero, he needs time to train with the squad and assimilate, so the sooner he comes in the better. We have enough depth in our squad to do without him for one game.
on a side note, Arsenal vs toons, baahahahaha Europa, Europa!
long-term it's better that he misses his CL game with Arse than it is with us. It could be a tough fixture, and whether he signs Monday or Wednesday he'd still play Sunday. That he doesn't train 2 extra days with the first team is irrelevant.
HellasLEAF
Well-Known Member
I'm sure we can handle Swansea at home with the services of Samir Nasri.
It'll get done when it gets done, it's a long season. Arsenal is not too thrilled about losing 2 of their 3 best players in one week I'm sure and it's making this transfer sticky.
It'll get done when it gets done, it's a long season. Arsenal is not too thrilled about losing 2 of their 3 best players in one week I'm sure and it's making this transfer sticky.
lionheart
Well-Known Member
Did you mean to say "without the services of Nasri"?HellasLEAF said:I'm sure we can handle Swansea at home with the services of Samir Nasri. It'll get done when it gets done, it's a long season. Arsenal is not too thrilled about losing 2 of their 3 best players in one week I'm sure and it's making this transfer sticky.
Citizenblue21
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 77
Nasri will give you more goals and assists but Modric will keep the ball for us better.sboroMCFC said:If we're gonna pay £25 million for Nasri, I'd rather pay an extra £10 million and get Modric.
Really don't know how we would fit Modric in the midfield anyway. Nige - Yaya - Silva should start in midfield 99 times out of 100 as long as they are all fit. Wouldn't like too see any of them moved out too make way for Modric.
HellasLEAF
Well-Known Member
lionheart said:Did you mean to say "without the services of Nasri"?HellasLEAF said:I'm sure we can handle Swansea at home with the services of Samir Nasri. It'll get done when it gets done, it's a long season. Arsenal is not too thrilled about losing 2 of their 3 best players in one week I'm sure and it's making this transfer sticky.
yes. mistake
lionheart
Well-Known Member
Personally I would have preferred to pay an extra 15 million and get Fabregas, but that won't happen either.sboroMCFC said:If we're gonna pay £25 million for Nasri, I'd rather pay an extra £10 million and get Modric.
Citizenblue21 said:Nasri will give you more goals and assists but Modric will keep the ball for us better.sboroMCFC said:If we're gonna pay £25 million for Nasri, I'd rather pay an extra £10 million and get Modric.
Really don't know how we would fit Modric in the midfield anyway. Nige - Yaya - Silva should start in midfield 99 times out of 100 as long as they are all fit. Wouldn't like too see any of them moved out too make way for Modric.
I haven't been following the 300 Nasri threads, is the general consensus that we're buying Nasri to play out wide then?
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
sboroMCFC said:If we're gonna pay £25 million for Nasri, I'd rather pay an extra £10 million and get Modric.
2 different players we need a Nasri type player. We don't need a Modric type player.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.