FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
SuperMario's Fireworks. said:
Komps being back is far more important.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nastasic
- Thread starter herrock
- Start date
Komps being back is far more important.
D.no
Well-Known Member
They said the same about Mica Richards at 19......................just saying..
grim up north
Well-Known Member
dwren said:They said the same about Mica Richards at 19......................just saying..
No comparison
dwren said:They said the same about Mica Richards at 19......................just saying..
If the injuries were occurring over the next couple of years then I would agree with you.
At all, not in the slightest. In fact the two players couldn't be any more different in how they play and read the game. Nastasic looks so natural whereas Micah has had to work hard to improve his general positioning and defensive work. Nastasic also looks so much smoother in possession which for such a young CB is a huge bonus for us, especially as it seems we intend to play from the back as often as we can.grim up north said:dwren said:They said the same about Mica Richards at 19......................just saying..
No comparison
I love Richards and would be happy to see him stay, but on a purely football level Nastasic has already shown me that he's a level above.
grim up north
Well-Known Member
Pablo1 said:At all, not in the slightest. In fact the two players couldn't be any more different in how they play and read the game. Nastasic looks so natural whereas Micah has had to work hard to improve his general positioning and defensive work. Nastasic also looks so much smoother in possession which for such a young CB is a huge bonus for us, especially as it seems we intend to play from the back as often as we can.grim up north said:dwren said:They said the same about Mica Richards at 19......................just saying..
No comparison
I love Richards and would be happy to see him stay, but on a purely football level Nastasic has already shown me that he's a level above.
Quite
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
grim up north said:Pablo1 said:At all, not in the slightest. In fact the two players couldn't be any more different in how they play and read the game. Nastasic looks so natural whereas Micah has had to work hard to improve his general positioning and defensive work. Nastasic also looks so much smoother in possession which for such a young CB is a huge bonus for us, especially as it seems we intend to play from the back as often as we can.grim up north said:No comparison
I love Richards and would be happy to see him stay, but on a purely football level Nastasic has already shown me that he's a level above.
Quite
I remenber Micah Richards, in a completely shite team, going up against Henry, isolated & winning most of the duels.
Henry would tear Nastasic a new arsehole.
Please do not try to re write history to suit your point of view.
I was talking about them from a purely footballing point of view. Micah has pace to burn so was more than capable of keeping good players quiet a few years ago. He's actually improved his game for the most part and although terrible against Sunderland and not looking at his best this season (due to injuries again for the most part) I'm more than happy for him to remain at the club.Neville Kneville said:grim up north said:Pablo1 said:At all, not in the slightest. In fact the two players couldn't be any more different in how they play and read the game. Nastasic looks so natural whereas Micah has had to work hard to improve his general positioning and defensive work. Nastasic also looks so much smoother in possession which for such a young CB is a huge bonus for us, especially as it seems we intend to play from the back as often as we can.
I love Richards and would be happy to see him stay, but on a purely football level Nastasic has already shown me that he's a level above.
Quite
I remenber Micah Richards, in a completely shite team, going up against Henry, isolated & winning most of the duels.
Henry would tear Nastasic a new arsehole.
Please do not try to re write history to suit your point of view.
Your last sentence is a load of bollocks, there's no rewriting history, just an overview of how I see the two players and how I fail to see any comparisons in their respective games.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Neville Kneville said:grim up north said:Pablo1 said:At all, not in the slightest. In fact the two players couldn't be any more different in how they play and read the game. Nastasic looks so natural whereas Micah has had to work hard to improve his general positioning and defensive work. Nastasic also looks so much smoother in possession which for such a young CB is a huge bonus for us, especially as it seems we intend to play from the back as often as we can.
I love Richards and would be happy to see him stay, but on a purely football level Nastasic has already shown me that he's a level above.
Quite
I remenber Micah Richards, in a completely shite team, going up against Henry, isolated & winning most of the duels.
Henry would tear Nastasic a new arsehole.
Please do not try to re write history to suit your point of view.
well you're writing fiction about a duel that will never happen...
At least the guy you quoted is going off stuff he's seen, you're just making it up.