You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nathan Ake
- Thread starter jaiguruKun
- Start date
Exactly. Absolute insult this price40m is an insult when we paid 41m and now his a far more controlled player chelsea need a centre back a home grown player we should be telling them its 70m
However if we sell ake at this price, something weird is happening behind the scenes. May be some tough ffp
Ake's value is lowering. He is 25m€ player according to Transfermarkt. Mainly because he is NOT PLAYING.
Well clubs don’t look at that for references only sado’s
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,740
So a deal is going to get done then, this is the usual postering in the media before a deal is done.
Thanks for your efforts Nathan, all the best. A profit in the books and another big wage cleared. Will Pep trust in Mbete or will we go for a senior choice again.
Thanks for your efforts Nathan, all the best. A profit in the books and another big wage cleared. Will Pep trust in Mbete or will we go for a senior choice again.
oddfellows
Well-Known Member
We are in the box seat he is contracted to us
Charlesfarsbar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 1,157
The club obviously thinks differently to youHe played in half our games last season.
And even if it was 5-10 games, it isn't just about being a body or a number there, a player has to actually perform there.
Ake can, and does. A kid can't, otherwise he'd be in the first team.
That's the difference between winning trophies and not. That was the difference last year, without Ake and some of his big performances in some pretty big games, we would have won fuck all. That is why the club bought a 40m international to be one of 4 defenders for 2 spots.
That is why this 'cash in on 4th choice and give his minutes to a kid' claim that a few seem to be making just plain wrong.