Bigga
Well-Known Member
Or NATO can back off and engage in peace talks and the world can get trade back to some working degree.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
NATO
- Thread starter Rascal
- Start date
Or NATO can back off and engage in peace talks and the world can get trade back to some working degree.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
The downplaying? You can't even be arsed to research russias neo nazi problem and how they have been operating in Europe and Syria for years. You have fell for it big time, you should go russia and tell them how bad the west are, they will send you straight to Bakhmut with a rusty rifle and a bike helmet.
But... the West aren't arming Russia's neo Nazis...??
No sure what your argument is...
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
But... the West aren't arming Russia's neo Nazis...??
No sure what your argument is...
The arguement is that you have lost your marbles and think it's a personality trait to embarrass yourself on this forum daily.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Back off from where?Or NATO can back off and engage in peace talks and the world can get trade back to some working degree.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
The arguement is that you have lost your marbles and think it's a personality trait to embarrass yourself on this forum daily.
So because you can't debunk arming neo nazis, you resort to insults?
I did think you were better than that.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Back off from where?
Did you not read the rest of the post?
Is that not worth exploring?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Where are NATO troops right now that they shouldn't be?Did you not read the rest of the post?
Is that not worth exploring?
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Where are NATO troops right now that they shouldn't be?
Did I mention troops? I don't recall that.
How else would they 'back off and engage in peace talks'?
But, this is my problem. It's never debunked, just ignored.
It's a simple question and I guess it's hard to adjust your moral compass because of it it; are you okay arming Neo Nazis? It's simply a yes or no.
It's probably why I keep returning to the point that's never been answered.
Yes, I’m 100% OK arming a country that has a tiny amount of neo-nazis in its armed forces in their fight against a country that’s also got a bunch of neo-nazis.
Every country has these people on their armed forces, including us, and it’s something every country has to stay on top of.
We’ve seen all the evidence anyone would ever need to see that the 1,000 members of the Azov Battalion are not representative of the 250,000 strong Ukrainian army nor the population as a whole.
So why would anyone think we should not arm Ukraine over them?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
So what are they backing off from if they're not actually fighting?Did I mention troops? I don't recall that.
How else would they 'back off and engage in peace talks'?