Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 21,330
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
So don't wear spandex whilst riding thenI can ride a bike, I’d look a right plonker in spandex tho…. Although suppose everyone does
So don't wear spandex whilst riding thenI can ride a bike, I’d look a right plonker in spandex tho…. Although suppose everyone does
Like the 'midget gems' in another thread, long established expressions and practices are changed because small groups complain, often as few as one indidual.Rules ?
The Highway Code was never the law, and was only intended as a guide, and much of it advisory at that, has something changed ?
Those ‘proposals’ seem idiotic and almost like a cyclist/pedestrian has done it.
Drivers become better drivers once they ride bikes, IMO.What annoys me most as a cyclist is dangerous overtakes by motorists.
If a motorist overtakes me and immediately has to brake then it wasn't safe to overtake in the first place. Also close passes(<1.5m) really piss me off whether it's 20mph or 80mph. Worst one I had was a double decker bus doing around 60mph. It passed me within 3ft when the driver had the whole road to use to overtake safely.
I dont look a plonker wearing my Motley Crue / Poison / Twisted Sister spandex whilst cycling!I can ride a bike, I’d look a right plonker in spandex tho…. Although suppose everyone does
There was a public consultation on the proposed changes which EVERYONE had a right to contribute towards.Like the 'midget gems' in another thread, long established expressions and practices are changed because small groups complain, often as few as one indidual.
Yet complain forever about the media's football coverage and in particular the supposedly impartial BBC - no chance, no change.
Do you have a pot belly?I dont look a plonker wearing my Motley Crue / Poison / Twisted Sister spandex whilst cycling!
do i?
Course i do...im 46 :-)Do you have a pot belly?
Those cyclists always make laugh.
New highway code hierarchy explained - and cyclists get priority over drivers
DRIVERS now have to give extra priority to cyclists that are travelling on UK roads. The new rule, which came into force today, means drivers won’t have as much power on the road when it come…www.thesun.co.uk
Some dangerous new rules imo none more so than allowing pedestrians the right to cross on a junction you are turning into, people will be knocked over as they just walk out in front of cars, how will this work in a big city where there are people waiting to cross roads every minute of the day, of course, you stopping as you are half way through the action of turning will surely mean a greater chance of somebody else running into the back of you.
Discuss.
ps I used the sun as it isn't behind a paywall and has diagrams lol
Since you are being a bit of smart arse know it all, you need to read the difference between rule 170 and the new rule.1/ its a code not law
2/ I was always taught to give way to pedestrians crossing at a junction - attached is an older version of the Highway Code - Rule 170 may enlighten some
http://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/uplo...ial-highway-code-with-annexes-uk-en-12-04.pdf
3/ I cycle and I taught my kids to cycle in the centre of the lane - riding in the gutter is suicidal
What does? Which part?Works totally fine on the continent