New PL Commercial rule passed (pg4) | City rumoured to be questioning the legality

halfcenturyup said:
But that is what they want. This isn't for all transactions, just associated party transactions. And the Pl gets to decide what is associated and what isn't.

So, City want a sponsorship from a company who has a board member related to Khaldoon? Associated, follow the rules. United want a sponsorship from a company who has a Board member in common with Ineos? Minority owner, no problem. You can see where this is going. The courts.
Click to expand...
Agreed. It is an act of bad faith and can only end up in the courts.
 
cheekybids said:
For the record it makes perfect sense they get far more but do they ever have to justify it like we would.
Click to expand...
Yeah makes perfect sense that your shareholders with nominated board members of the major German conglomerates should be the sponsors

The remaining 25% is evenly divided among three corporate giants – Adidas, Allianz, and Audi – with each holding an 8.3% share.

The FC Bayern München AG supervisory board consists of chairman Herbert Hainer (president of FC Bayern München eV), Dr. Jan Heinemann (General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer adidas AG), Markus Duesmann (CEO of Audi AG), Dr. Werner Zedelius (Senior Advisor Allianz SE), Uli Hoeneß (honorary president of FC Bayern München eV), Thorsten Langheim (board member responsible for USA and group development at Deutsche Telekom AG), Professor Dr. Dieter Mayer (first vice president of FC Bayern München eV), Dr. Edmund Stoiber (former Minister-President of Bavaria) and Karl-Heinz Rummenigge (long-serving CEO of FC Bayern München AG).

1707679844736.png

Also the former chief UEFA investigator Yves Leterme has a role at VW Group, who via Audi are a shareholder in Bayern Munchen and the Auid CEO is also a board member

Volkswagen Group has taken further steps to strengthen its sustainability management, appointing nine experts to its Sustainability Council.
  • Yves Leterme – former OECD deputy secretary-general and former Prime Minister of Belgium
 
Mail Sport can reveal that seven of the clubs who refused the back the Premier League’s introduction of new associated party transaction rules [APT] this week were among the eight who voted down proposals to ban loan transfers last November, leading to concerns amongst the executive over the emergence of a group of serial rebels.

Manchester City, Newcastle, Chelsea, Everton, Nottingham Forest and Sheffield United are understood to have voted against the Premier League at a tense shareholders’ meeting on Friday, with Crystal Palace and Burnley believed to have abstained.

REBELS ffs. It's a power struggle we need to win.
 
Brendan110_0 said:
Mail Sport can reveal that seven of the clubs who refused the back the Premier League’s introduction of new associated party transaction rules [APT] this week were among the eight who voted down proposals to ban loan transfers last November, leading to concerns amongst the executive over the emergence of a group of serial rebels.

Manchester City, Newcastle, Chelsea, Everton, Nottingham Forest and Sheffield United are understood to have voted against the Premier League at a tense shareholders’ meeting on Friday, with Crystal Palace and Burnley believed to have abstained.

REBELS ffs. It's a power struggle we need to win.
Click to expand...

Its shocking our press/media cant see the threat to our game the American red tops and spurs are.
To call the clubs that stand up against them as rebels its ridiculous. These are the clubs that are trying to save our game
 
give it to gordon said:
Its shocking our press/media cant see the threat to our game the American red tops and spurs are.
To call the clubs that stand up against them as rebels its ridiculous. These are the clubs that are trying to save our game
Click to expand...
I like to think of us as more the resistance, standing up to an evil dictatorship.
 
give it to gordon said:
Its shocking our press/media cant see the threat to our game the American red tops and spurs are.
To call the clubs that stand up against them as rebels its ridiculous. These are the clubs that are trying to save our game
Click to expand...
Lots of just movements in history have been labelled rebels,such as the suffragettes, also formed from Manchester
 
paulchapo said:
Palace and Burnley abstained....why? They shouldn't be allowed to abstain. If they're allowed to vote it should be yes or no. Their fans will be the next ones crying and blaming fucking City when it goes tits up for them,like the scouse cunts.
Click to expand...

Harsh but fair, they've crawled up the red shirts arses too many times to be anything other than useful idiots.
 
paulchapo said:
I've got no sympathy for any of them, not one. Their universal hatred for everything City because they're brain dead jealous sheep means I'll rejoice if every one of them gets relegated or worse
Click to expand...

My response to the cunts now is everyone knows you’ve cheated, accept the 10 pts & whatever’s coming….

Empathy tank is empty..
 
Pleasure to have you on Bluemoon, a quick update, before SKY, 1 team qualified for the CL liverpool usually, then SKY came along and 2 teams qualified for the CL liverpool and utd usually, take a look at SKY sponsored teams, CL expanded 3 teams Arsenal,liverpool and utd usually, along came Chelsea and 4 teams qualified for the CL, you can blame religion if you want as all had the same background, along came City and all shit broke out, then you came, oh the fun, a G14 team can drop out of the CL occasionally but if you push them out that occasionally becomes regular, which will upset everyone in power at the FA UEFA and the PL
Random Precision said:
After Newcastle were taken over and the PL Clubs, City abstained, voted to bring in FMV, they told the meeting what they were doing was illegal. You may well be correct with your assumption and I as a Newcastle fan hope it is. These cartel clubs need taken down.
Click to expand...
 
salfordbluetrue said:
Pleasure to have you on Bluemoon, a quick update, before SKY, 1 team qualified for the CL liverpool usually, then SKY came along and 2 teams qualified for the CL liverpool and utd usually, take a look at SKY sponsored teams, CL expanded 3 teams Arsenal,liverpool and utd usually, along came Chelsea and 4 teams qualified for the CL, you can blame religion if you want as all had the same background, along came City and all shit broke out, then you came, oh the fun, a G14 team can drop out of the CL occasionally but if you push them out that occasionally becomes regular, which will upset everyone in power at the FA UEFA and the PL
Click to expand...
Thanks for your welcome and I agree with your summation of the progression under Sky. I hope, that the split that’s clearly developed amongst PL clubs, threatens and brings down the American owned cartel that has dominated for to long.

City and now Newcastle certainly have the wealth to lead any challenge on a legal front and at boardroom level should be cooperating with each other which I’m sure they are. the next year or so is going to be interesting and I feel the threat of legal action by whoever isnt an empty threat.

BTW I hope you win that fourth title and make history and it won’t be many years before we’ll be able to seriously challenge you on the pitch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top