New striker?

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

Three words:

Erling...

Braut ...

Håland!
===
Erling seems clumsy if you watch him - but wow! He is extremely pacy, has a clinical shot and is able to set up teammates... and his apparent clumsiness is just that - "apparent." His unique blend of size/ball-skill/finishing makes him unplayable at times.

Rumor has it that he'll end up at Bayern - maybe so - but if we can at all prise him away from Dortmund - he'd be the striker I'd want most of all.

 

[citytill1die84]

Pep laying the blame to the board?

I mean how could we not afford a new striker? We had plenty of outgoings.

Money has to be put aside for Messi.

 

[Phil1]

Pep laying the blame to the board?

I mean how could we not afford a new striker? We had plenty of outgoings.

Money has to be put aside for Messi.

It’s reality, not blame.

 

[citytill1die84]

It’s reality, not blame.

Explain?

 

[Phil1]

Explain?

It’s in his prematch comments for this game. Sure you can find them.

 

[Tb1981]

Still think it will be Messi.

Can we not get someone a bit more prolific up front?

 

[citytill1die84]

It’s in his prematch comments for this game. Sure you can find them.

I've seen them but explain reality? Why haven't City got the money to sign a striker?

 

[blueparrot]

Pep laying the blame to the board?

I mean how could we not afford a new striker? We had plenty of outgoings.

Money has to be put aside for Messi.

No, it's obvious why, and no.

 

[citytill1die84]

No, it's obvious why, and no.

Tell me why?

 

[Phil1]

I've seen them but explain reality? Why haven't City got the money to sign a striker?

Because we have a budget and act accordingly. It’s not ideal as I’d love to see a 100m striker come in but the reality is we aren’t in a position to do so atm.
We obviously decided the back 4 was more important to improve this season and have done so.
Losing our two CFs makes it seem like a bad decision but that’s football.