Nick Griffin on Question Time..

tommyducks said:
Nreddishblue said:
He was attacked throughout the media in the run up to the program, in so called "right wing" papers such as the Daily Mail and Telegraph. The program itself was a farce, which showed up the Tweedledee and tweedledum parties and the media lickspittles for what they are. The audience was a joke, packed to the rafters with political activists from the corrupt parties.

The outraged lefties who would never have liked him in the first place, will not be impressed of course, but then again, they never will.

Britain, was not a mongrel nation before 1945. Britain has always had to some extent immigrants, but primarily of European stock.

We were not a mongrel nation before 1945, we have always had some sort of
Immigrants have enriched our nation in many ways. Of course in Empire days, we colonised these people and helped ourselves to their natural resources in exchange for British passports, not thinking for one minute that some bastard would invent the airplane.

"We" didn't colonise anything. Anyway, that is no justification for what is happening now. I would beg to differ that immigration post 1945 has enriched the country.
 
crizack said:
dannybcity said:
Grow up FFS, no ones saying that they want Britain to become a Muslim state even 99.9% of British Muslims. I've never heard of this Anjem Choudary bloke, nor I suspect have most people in Britain so to just pull an extremist out of your arse and to hold him up to in an attempt to someway justify the BNP's racist views is pathetic.


you IDIOT!!!!!!

you don't even know who the second most prolific muslim extremist in europe is!? the fact that HIS and ABU HAMZAS ideals are to have shari'ah law as common law in the english legal system doesn't say they want an islamic orientated country...don't even bother trying to have a stand if your just going to be a dick!


hey im a muslim... and theres no way i would want nor do i agree with the shariah law.

according to my knowledge ( i may be wrong) but this law is formed and should be practised when u have a islamic state meaning when 99% of the state are muslims.

those who preach hate and request that this country should be shariah are god dam emotionally confused nutters who need to be put away! hence the need for education for all the wrong people in this world!

public whipping, illegalise weed, no women in public!?!? are they for real. imagine that.... eww! theres no way in this world anyone gnna take my green and women. :))

i dont know about u guys but there will never be a shariah state. esp in europe. the idea just seems so unrealistic and those who are for it, need to head off elsewhere cos we dont want this law!

abu hamza's supporters... well majority of them dont even have jobs, and are brain washed by clerics who do nothing but preach hate but yet are scared headless chickens who wouldnt even carry out such actions.


as i keep repeating

lets love each other...unless your a united supporter than a beatdown is required first.

spread peace and unity!
 
crizack said:
dannybcity said:
Grow up FFS, no ones saying that they want Britain to become a Muslim state even 99.9% of British Muslims. I've never heard of this Anjem Choudary bloke, nor I suspect have most people in Britain so to just pull an extremist out of your arse and to hold him up to in an attempt to someway justify the BNP's racist views is pathetic.


you IDIOT!!!!!!

you don't even know who the second most prolific muslim extremist in europe is!? the fact that HIS and ABU HAMZAS ideals are to have shari'ah law as common law in the english legal system doesn't say they want an islamic orientated country...don't even bother trying to have a stand if your just going to be a dick!

I am not sure why you are getting so angry.

In any event, in British muslim society, such types are taken as the joke they are and are generally ignored. It seems to be more of an obsession of the white, tabloid reading section of society but, then, re-inforcing what you would like to believe to be right is always good entertainment. Personally, I would be happy if anyone campaigning that democray be replaced is then sent down for as long as it takes for them to rehabilitate, be that the Griffins or Hamzas of this world. A great struggle today in taking place in Pakistan where an entire nation, supporting its democratically elected government, is fighting the evil of terrorism and extremism on its doorstep. However, the tabloids would have you believe the opposite.
 
dannybcity said:
No I don't because I don't really give a shite what he's got to say. I don't live my life in fear of the brown skinned people, Britain will not become an Islamic state therefore I'm not scared of this man and he doesn't even enter my radar. It must be shit being you, ranking the scariest Muslim's in Europe with your spare time.

As for introducing Shari'ah law into common law as far as I'm aware there are aspects of Jewish law in English common law, I don't see the problem with that providing it's well regulated and superseeded by English law.

Deary me.
 
alabaster said:
Nreddishblue said:
He was attacked throughout the media in the run up to the program, in so called "right wing" papers such as the Daily Mail and Telegraph. The program itself was a farce, which showed up the Tweedledee and tweedledum parties and the media lickspittles for what they are. The audience was a joke, packed to the rafters with political activists from the corrupt parties.

The outraged lefties who would never have liked him in the first place, will not be impressed of course, but then again, they never will.

Britain, was not a mongrel nation before 1945. Britain has always had to some extent immigrants, but primarily of European stock.

I suggest you check your facts before making yourself look an idiot in future. Perhaps you'd like to read this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/intro/intro.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/path ... /intro.htm</a>

I said "primarily" of European stock. Read my post before making yourself look an idiot.
 
Alex B said:
dannybcity said:
No I don't because I don't really give a shite what he's got to say. I don't live my life in fear of the brown skinned people, Britain will not become an Islamic state therefore I'm not scared of this man and he doesn't even enter my radar. It must be shit being you, ranking the scariest Muslim's in Europe with your spare time.

As for introducing Shari'ah law into common law as far as I'm aware there are aspects of Jewish law in English common law, I don't see the problem with that providing it's well regulated and superseeded by English law.

Deary me.

Expand, tell me where I've gone wrong.
 
Goater's Shin said:
coleridge said:
We have. It's a points system to proritise skilled workers who, sadly for poor old Nick, will probably be mostly non-white. Anyway, I just wish someone had asked him if he was willing to undergo genetic testing as, in a certain light, he looks a little Asian to me...

Thats an insult to Asians. He looks like Gordon browns ugly brother. I was just grateful I wasn't watching in HD. If he's a pure englishmen then god help the 'survival of the indigenous population' cos if every englishman looked like that googly eyed moron nobody would get laid.

I know! It was self-parody. Anyway, we should move away from how he looks as that's his game. Just focus on his evil mind instead.
 
Nreddishblue said:
tommyducks said:
Immigrants have enriched our nation in many ways. Of course in Empire days, we colonised these people and helped ourselves to their natural resources in exchange for British passports, not thinking for one minute that some bastard would invent the airplane.

"We" didn't colonise anything. Anyway, that is no justification for what is happening now. I would beg to differ that immigration post 1945 has enriched the country.

So we didn't colonise India, North America, Africa, Australia etc. then? What planet are you living on?
 
Nreddishblue said:
alabaster said:
I suggest you check your facts before making yourself look an idiot in future. Perhaps you'd like to read this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/intro/intro.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/path ... /intro.htm</a>

I said "primarily" of European stock. Read my post before making yourself look an idiot.

And how can you tell who is primarily of European stock and who isn't? What's the difference between someone of European stock and someone of African or Asian stock? An immigrant is an immigrant. Or do you just have a problem with non-white immigrants? I would suggest that there is not a great deal of difference in the percentage of immigrants living here now than at many other points in history. Britain has always been a mongrel nation.
 
dannybcity said:
crizack said:
you IDIOT!!!!!!

you don't even know who the second most prolific muslim extremist in europe is!? the fact that HIS and ABU HAMZAS ideals are to have shari'ah law as common law in the english legal system doesn't say they want an islamic orientated country...don't even bother trying to have a stand if your just going to be a dick!

No I don't because I don't really give a shite what he's got to say. I don't live my life in fear of the brown skinned people, Britain will not become an Islamic state therefore I'm not scared of this man and he doesn't even enter my radar. It must be shit being you, ranking the scariest Muslim's in Europe with your spare time.

As for introducing Shari'ah law into common law as far as I'm aware there are aspects of Jewish law in English common law, I don't see the problem with that providing it's well regulated and superseeded by English law.


i don't spend my spare time ranking the most prolific radicals in europe, i'm just educated.

here's a quote from little anjem -

british soldiers are 'terrorists', the same as Nazi troops 'who cannot be excused for simply carrying out their duty'.

jewish law in english common law is obvious, as the basics on english law are based on the 10 commandments, even when it comes to being tried in a crown court by 12 peers.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.