Nigel De Jong (cont)

[brian the blue]

Unless i've misheard, that tool outside our ground reporting for SSN has just said we've sold de jong for a fee "north of £10million". That true?

 

[swightman88]

i just heard that, i think he may have got that wrong, hope he hasn`t tho

 

[Mayor West]

Unless i've misheard, that tool outside our ground reporting for SSN has just said we've sold de jong for a fee "north of £10million". That true?

Yeah I heard that too, but sky do get a lot wrong but I really hope that is true!

 

[adrianr]

Edit: As above.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Unless i've misheard, that tool outside our ground reporting for SSN has just said we've sold de jong for a fee "north of £10million". That true?

I just heard that too. Just goes to show that none of us know anything when it comes to fees!

Is Marwood in or out following this latest fee revelation?!

 

[Hart of the Matter]

Sky guy saying sold for just north of 10 m

 

[Lancet Fluke]

Unless i've misheard, that tool outside our ground reporting for SSN has just said we've sold de jong for a fee "north of £10million". That true?

Just rewound it and he did say that. That would be much more like it if it's true.

 

[bluefandk]

What sources do people have for the 3,5 million pound fee? I havent been able to find any relible source to confirm that, in fact the best source for the fee is the 10 million quoted by Sky.

 

[Shooter 83]

i just heard that, i think he may have got that wrong, hope he hasn`t tho

It was never 3.5M you'd be mad to believe that.

 

[Lancet Fluke]

i just heard that, i think he may have got that wrong, hope he hasn`t tho

It was never 3.5M you'd be mad to believe that.

Well lots on this thread did believe it (me included) and quite a few even thought 3.5 million was absolutely fine. Hopoefully 10 is nearer the truth.