Nike to make Kits

[1_barry_conlon]

When I read this post this post my heart nearly broke.
I love umbro, its a great thing that city are with umbra because umbra do great jerseys.
Umbro connects city to its past, umbro relates to England, umbro differentiates itself form all the other really successful clubs that wear nike or adidas.
I am so sad but this does not come at a surprise, nike, after like about three years, have realized that City are going places and they want to sponsor that success. And because theses nike scums own umbro, they have the total ability to step. But Why should WE conform? Why should City have to change because a club in moving toward success? I don't want city to be looked at like just another arsenal, barcelona, man utd. I want city to have a separate group, a solo group, and Umbro helped city differentiate itself. keeping Umbro will show that we don't want to conform.

But once again, success will take place wearing the jerseys of a corrupt Company, who not only have been accuse of exploitation in CHina, but who control the entire football industry and leave no chance for the small groups. Corruption always rules and it kills me. !!

IS THERE SOMETHING WE CAN DO?? A PETITION OR SOMETHING? City official need to
understand that this is unacceptable.

Hear hear, let's storm the Bastille. Who's with me Citizens?

 

[Anonymous]

nike make the crappest football tops ever. cant believe were doing this yes I get the money side- sigh, but lets be honest nike is just shit

 

[squirtyflower]

nike make the crappest football tops ever. cant believe were doing this yes I get the money side- sigh, but lets be honest nike is just shit

Umbro is a subsidiary of Nike

 

[Anonymous]

nike make the crappest football tops ever. cant believe were doing this yes I get the money side- sigh, but lets be honest nike is just shit

Umbro is a subsidiary of Nike

it maybe but umbro make the better kits theres no doubt about it, just look at our kit and previous seasons kits compared to united

 

[squirtyflower]

nike make the crappest football tops ever. cant believe were doing this yes I get the money side- sigh, but lets be honest nike is just shit

Umbro is a subsidiary of Nike

it maybe but umbro make the better kits theres no doubt about it, just look at our kit and previous seasons kits compared to united

which in essence are Nike kits without the tick

 

[HellasLEAF]

Nike make damn fine kits nowadays though. No, not all their kits. But most of them.

Nothing will top Umbro though. It's a sad day, Umbro are the top kit maker imo.

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

Umbro is a subsidiary of Nike

it maybe but umbro make the better kits theres no doubt about it, just look at our kit and previous seasons kits compared to united

which in essence are Nike kits without the tick

Not really, up until recently our kits were designed in Cheadle by the Umbro team, but from next year they will be designed in Oregon.

 

[squirtyflower]

it maybe but umbro make the better kits theres no doubt about it, just look at our kit and previous seasons kits compared to united

which in essence are Nike kits without the tick

Not really, up until recently our kits were designed in Cheadle by the Umbro team, but from next year they will be designed in Oregon.

could be the cheadle crew are shipped out to the states

 

[nijinsky's fetlocks]

When I read this post this post my heart nearly broke.
I love umbro, its a great thing that city are with umbra because umbra do great jerseys.
Umbro connects city to its past, umbro relates to England, umbro differentiates itself form all the other really successful clubs that wear nike or adidas.
I am so sad but this does not come at a surprise, nike, after like about three years, have realized that City are going places and they want to sponsor that success. And because theses nike scums own umbro, they have the total ability to step. But Why should WE conform? Why should City have to change because a club in moving toward success? I don't want city to be looked at like just another arsenal, barcelona, man utd. I want city to have a separate group, a solo group, and Umbro helped city differentiate itself. keeping Umbro will show that we don't want to conform.

But once again, success will take place wearing the jerseys of a corrupt Company, who not only have been accuse of exploitation in CHina, but who control the entire football industry and leave no chance for the small groups. Corruption always rules and it kills me. !!

IS THERE SOMETHING WE CAN DO?? A PETITION OR SOMETHING? City official need to understand that this is unacceptable.

Quite right.
I want my replica shirts to be made by a Cuban Workers Marxist Co-operative who are all paid the average national hourly rate for their labours.
They must be made from ethically sourced and recycled Fair Trade alpaca hair that is dyed naturally,without the use of chemicals.
The alpaca's must have been allowed to roam free,and must have died of old age before shearing.
The shirt must be hand delivered by a post office union branch chairman who must whistle The Internationale whilst I sign for it.
The workers must control the means of production.
Power to the proletariat.

 

[BlueHubert]

Word is, much like the Etihad deal, the figures will remain private until they come out in the financial books.

Probably not to hand UEFA any excuse to try and block the Etihad deal, but hearing £120m - over the next six years.

35m from Ethihad sponsorship
20m from new Nike sponsorship

Not bad considering. We just need to get more of those low key big money sponsorships that toerh teams get. Look at the way Spurs have 2 sponsors for Wurope and the League. Look at the way the scum have DHL on the training gear, 10mil per year.

We need to start pulling more of those in and we are going to be sitting pretty very soon. At least I reckon we are going to be very much closer to breaking even if we can get further into Europe next season.

We had loses of £194m last year, but I assume that that included the players that weren't playing for us, subsidised wages, amortisisation (sp?), so the real amount that UEFA would consider would be much less, say £140m. With our work this year and regardles of whether we get rid of Ade, RSC etc... we should be nearer the £100m losses which shows a marked downward trend (30odd%)

In the next few years if we are lucky enough for our youth policy to pay off and we have the likes of Suarez, Mepen Walter, Bunn, Boyata, Roman, Rekik, Assulin, etc.. coming into the frame we are going to be fine because we will have lower wages, much lower amotisisation and if we can get those big players we have, Silva, Nasri, Aguero etc... to resign we don't have any futher amortisisation to show on the balalnce sheet making things look evben healthier. We'll see I suppose.