MillionDollarDream
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 2,891
By another navas I don't mean they're the same player, I mean it's gonna be another useless signing
How do you know this?
By another navas I don't mean they're the same player, I mean it's gonna be another useless signing
Personally I think he'd a Son, Willian, arnautovic type impact - not spectacular but surprisingly effective.By another navas I don't mean they're the same player, I mean it's gonna be another useless signing
Personally I think he'd a Son, Willian, arnautovic type impact - not spectacular but surprisingly effective.
How do you know this?
Because that's my opinion on him?
Not a very informed one. If we are actually interested in signing him, then the club/Pep finds some use for him.
It's because you've never seen him play. But I don't blame you, if a team like Atletico Madrid was heavily linked to Vardy, their fans would probably react similarly.Don't disagree, I'm just stating that I think it's a useless signing because I don't rate him highly
hope not, I'm pish.......He's a similar type of player to pedro
Fair point. I tend not to get hung up too much about transfer fees and resale values, as things like this can easily become distractions from enjoying the game of footy for what it is. A bit like the way commentators find it hard to praise a player's ability during a game without mentioning his cost.I think money does matter as do transfer fees , but I don't think this should preclude us from buying older players .
Had Demichaelis left after two seasons I would argue that he had been the best value centre back we have bought since the takeover in spite of having no transfer value.
Value is about Transfer fees paid plus wages and signing on fees minus transfer fee received against performance and time spent at the club.
Older players often settle and perform more quickly.