nmc
Well-Known Member
Maybe explains why the finish is so god awful.Didn’t Worsley say the construction company, was it Laing O'Rourke, lost money on building the South Stand expansion. Stand corrected on that.
Maybe explains why the finish is so god awful.Didn’t Worsley say the construction company, was it Laing O'Rourke, lost money on building the South Stand expansion. Stand corrected on that.
Either he’s MASSIVE or that train is tinyNo, mate.
It took 10 years to build Metrolink to the Etihad. Parts of HS2, including the Manchester leg have been paused for 2 years to try and save money. There’s absolutely no chance ever of a monorail happening.
Maybe something similar could be constructed in time for the North stand expansion opening?
View attachment 71984
Monorails are for theme parksCan't we build a monorail from town?
Monorails are for theme parks
Motorways cost £10m a mile ???Cheap?
Upwards of £500m
HS2 is >£400m a mile
Motorway £10M a mile
Metrolink Expansion to TC £350m for 3 miles
Who do you suggest would fund this?
It was clear what & which I was referring to.The Dubai metro and the Dubai monorail are two different things.
The metro is an overhead rail line, good luck getting that through planning given the furore over the overland/overhead HS2 proposal into Piccadilly.
The monorail is like the one at Epcot, or in The Simpsons, depending on your reference. It cost over £300M in 2009 for a 3 mile stretch from The Palms and carries about 100 people per trip. Not exactly mass transit.
We've got what we're going to get, we just need to make it work
City had a 63,000 capacity stadium when I started watching and rarely had more than 20,000 inside. In my first four years of watching City only two matches sold out. The first was against United with a (pay at the gate) 1-1 draw that virtually ensured that City rather than United would go down. The second was a sixth round (all ticket) FA Cup match against Everton where City lost after two replays to the eventual Cup Winners.I replied to a post asking would we fill a 70,000 stadium. Some people, even some of our own fans, don’t think we’ll fill this new stand in a 62,000(?) stadium.
City could have a stadium the size of Old Trafford and United could have a stadium the size of the Camp Nou and priced accordingly we’d both sell out. Whether we both sell out now is neither here nor there really, both stadiums are far too small for the size of our fanbases. And it would be fair ticket prices that would determine the eventual capacity.
54,000 is quite a piddly little stadium in my eyes. That we’re selling that out now isn’t a good achievement for a club that once had an 85,000 stadium and have dozens of attendances over 70,000. Plus when it’s £68 a ticket for adults and £37 a ticket for kids, we don’t sell out.
West Ham have shown this. They historically have only the eleventh all-time highest average attendance but have moved into a stadium where they now have the second highest average attendance in the country, and they don’t even win or even challenge for anything.
Spurs stadium is very nice, but it’s 15,000 seats too small, Arsenal’s is about 25,000 seats too small. Liverpool are adding to their stadium but even when they’ve joined this new bit onto the Anfield Road end, it’ll still be about 30,000 seats too small for their fanbase.
That would be a classic@Yelloways Army
What do you reckon to this?