supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,970
That's exactly what it is, so we can compare it to 9320 etc, i dont think anyone would argue that the 9320 has a similar atmosphere to the singing sections. We should be trying to create a better atmosphere throughout the new stand than the current singing sections.
It doesn't need to be the 93:20 though. It doesn't need to offer padded seats. You get a standard seat like the rest of the stand, at the bottom of the tier in prime seats which deserve a premium cost and you get access to your own bar which is pay as you go. The season ticket cost is slightly more than the rest of the stand, but not dramatically more. Then it will work fine, but I fully understand the cynicism around it - and fundamentally it's about the overall perception of the stand. We're picturing big games with banners and noise and having people emerge late on and not joining in will make a negative impact. You could do with your most hardcore fans being at the front of it to do the banners, and at the back to make the most of the roof. But we're talking about a huge stand with about 10,000 people in it. We can take 2,500 to an away game and make a racket, so grouping a good 9,000 fans together will do the job regardless of who is sat amongst them.