North Stand Construction Discussion

jrb said:
If there was an issue involving empty seats being constantly visible in the North stand, it wasn’t on L2.

Nobody wanted anybody removed. It was just that the Family stand didn’t work from the empty seats perspective, especially during midweek night games.

We don’t know what the plans are for the family stand and NSL1 going forward.
Click to expand...
Behave now.. Iv watched this thread for months has have a good m8 who actually sits in them middle front few L2 seats and it was only 2/3 weeks ago that it came across as kids and those who couldn’t stand for 90 min wouldn’t be welcomed in that area . Sure it was even part of the 1894 and club questionnaire and overwhelmingly agreed “should the family stand be moved”

I’m all for a home safe standing end and get what you’re trying to achieve as I’m wanting to spend the next few years watching football as it should be “standing “ but please don’t use them who you really don’t care for as ammunition to fight the fight

My m8s is expecting to lose his seats but his reaction to reading your comment was the “cheeky fks , didn’t give a fk about us last week “
 
Be interesting to see what other blocks of south stand would be given to away supporters with the increase allocation
 
DiscoSteve said:
Last one from me for now - although not labelled as such, what it does do is show the side elevation comparisons between the South Stand Expansion and the North Stand Expansion - the rake of the seating and the height of the back row is less to allow for the Sky Bar to fit in above - which in itself seems to have multiple levels of 'loadsa-money-ness' levels for City Fans with money to burn to occupy! ;-)
View attachment 76357

And very very last word from me - I think the way they've done this wouldn't prevent us from extending upwards/backwards on the sides further if we wanted to in the future!
Click to expand...
This ' loads moneyness 'is a cheap shot .

The pandemic has changed values for many people,particularly the over 60s, who having lost 2.5 years of their lives, now want to enjoy new different and 'premium' experiences.

Airport lounges, extra leg room, 5* not 4*, Wagyu not Sirloin etc.

Some people have bigger or better cars than others or go out for Sunday lunch.....that doesn't warrant the sobriquet of "loadsa moneyness"

Each to their own eh !!
 
blingy said:
Behave now.. Iv watched this thread for months has have a good m8 who actually sits in them middle front few L2 seats and it was only 2/3 weeks ago that it came across as kids and those who couldn’t stand for 90 min wouldn’t be welcomed in that area . Sure it was even part of the 1894 and club questionnaire and overwhelmingly agreed “should the family stand be moved”

I’m all for a home safe standing end and get what you’re trying to achieve as I’m wanting to spend the next few years watching football as it should be “standing “ but please don’t use them who you really don’t care for as ammunition to fight the fight

My m8s is expecting to lose his seats but his reaction to reading your comment was the “cheeky fks , didn’t give a fk about us last week “
Click to expand...

Feel free to repost those comments and the 1894 questionnaire.

There has been plenty of discussion about relocating the family stand, not forcing people and kids out of the family stand/north stand. Discussing it and actively wanting it to happen are 2 completely different things. Regardless of what we discuss on here, it is the club who will make the decisions, just like they will with the proposed hospitality section at the front of level 2.

It was me who mentioned the fans currently sitting on level 2 who may have to make way for the proposed hospitality section at the front of the new level 2. 'I was supporting them'. Again, that decision will be made by the club.

There's no need for the aggressive tone from you and your m8.
 
Last edited:
jrb said:
Good shout. They definitely could be used for something rather than just being a flat roof. But it would need access.

St Michael’s office proposal including a roof top bar and space. Currently under construction.

View attachment 76361
Click to expand...

Yup...this is the sort of add-on customer experience facilities I thought the club would be thinking of including on the roof top claws.

Seems most recent commercial planning designs are making smarter use of rooftops & surprised City arn't on top of it.

There could be a hotel roof top bar/relax area on one claw & the other claw where the museum and shop is located could have a separate drinks/concession area on some partly covered roof top space for the transient patrons who arn't staying at the hotel. Access via a short stairwell or escalator or even ramp. May even help relieve some crowding from the City square bars/concession stands which I expect will be packed especially on match days.

The Sky bar would still retain its 'exclusivity' by access most likely gained via the VIP area & a pitch view which the other 'claw' areas can't provide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.