01cravend
Well-Known Member
Apparently 6 prem clubs and a bunch on the continent are interested on him. Which would probably point to our asking price being too low.
I'll just go with my eyes...Any stats to actually back that up?
That’s a no then, thanks.I'll just go with my eyes...
Ohhhhhh,harsh but true
That’s a no then, thanks.
Mate got to disagree hereAll I have said is that I am to be convinced Cucurella is an offensive upgrade on Zinchenko.
I have not said he is better defensively nor is he quicker.
How can you be certain Cucurella ismore of an attacking threat than Zinchenko, the naturally attacking midfielder?
Even as an out and out full back Zinchenko is better. Cucurella may only be better defensively and may have a better turn of pace, but aside that Zinchenko is far more capable and technically sound.Attacking from the LB position Cucurella is better...as a midfielder Zinny is better...
Whilst this is true, Zinchenko created more chances per 90 minutes than Cucurella did, it’s just that Zinchenko played 15 games to Cucurella’s 35.Mate got to disagree here
Its clear Pep wants a specialist left back and Cucurella created almost as many chances as any full back last season
The fact he got only one assist says more about Brighton’s woeful goalscoring than his ability to be a real threat going forward
The Villa game was probably the first time I’ve seen Zin going at his rival full back, though tbf I’m pretty sure he plays to specific instructions
Either way it’s an upgrade imo
Look at the teams in for him
You should always look to improve and Cucurella is an improvement imo
Getafe and Brighton can’t score for toffee.Cucurella used to play on the wing for Getafe and his best return is 1 goal and 5 assists. Has the potential to do better but £50mil+ for him is mental
Have to disagree with pretty much 100% of thatEven as an out and out full back Zinchenko is better. Cucurella may only be better defensively and may have a better turn of pace, but aside that Zinchenko is far more capable and technically sound.