Re: Only City still undefeated after 10 games
I prefer to think of us as 2 points off the mark while playing about as badly as we're capable of playing.MSP said:Chippy_boy said:MSP said:I'd rather if we had 9-0-1 in first 10 matches tbh.
8-0-2 would still leave us with 2 more points than we have.
Unbeaten means nowt in terms of our title-winning chances. (As is blindingly obvious from the fact that we are third, behind 2 teams that have lost already.)
Exactly. When reporter asked Hart about not beaten at home record after QPR game in May he answered - I couldn't care less about that record. And he was right - the draw in that game would see that record too but wouldn't see a title.
It's exactly how I feel about this still unbeaten stuff. Couldn't care less and would rather more points while being beaten.
Sunderland have same number of defeats as rags but sits near the end of the table with 15 points less.