Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 3,857
Having read the article again this morning, I must say it really is a terrible piece of work from a poor excuse of a journalist, who as you say seems intent on stealing Schindler’s gig as the self-loathing, navel-gazing ‘City fan’ and the meal ticket that comes with it.Interesting and well-balanced? My arse! Written by the new Colin Schindler out to get a name for himself by going against the club and its ever-increasing fanbase. Absolute bellend in my eyes. Why would any Blue want to write an article to besmirch the club? Let alone make up some shite that only RAWK activists or could latch onto as truth and run with it. This **** needs to get a serious grip and then, when he has, fuck right off from our club.
The whole thing reads as a borderline-satirical expose of the importance of ships to global trade in the 19th century. Appallingly written, too. Try as he might, and no matter how many times he repeats his simplistic logic, Hattenstone fails to make a persuasive argument to link Manchester’s ship emblem to the slave trade, and so any controversy around the use of the ship in the football club badges is somewhat hysterical.
Little to no attempt is made to provide balance, and Manchester’s proud history of economic Liberalism is regrettably (but rather predictably) skipped over. For example, no mention is made of the influential Manchester School of Economics, which saw free trade as the route to a more equitable and peaceful society, and - ironically enough - essentially advocated Britain abandoning its colonies and the taxes which supported them. Needless to say, the Manchester School was strongly opposed to slavery, with the betterment of conditions for the poorest of society being the central element of its philosophy.
Given the pioneering nature of this school of thought, in particular how it promoted economic theory as a route to a fairer and freer society, some celebration of free trade within Manchester’s coat of arms seems wholly appropriate. But all of this is lost on Hattenstone, who appears incapable of producing anything beyond a bit of bland virtue-signalling and a few mis-directed pops at our football club.
Thank God our city had some genuine intellectual heft behind it back in the day and didn’t have to rely on the likes of the present-day Guardian for direction or indeed the mealy mouthed Andy Burnham, who I note refuses to defend the Manchester coat of arms.