Our Badge

He suggests it should be changed to the bee if you read that far.

Yes but not demanding or campaigning like people are reacting to.

The mail picked up the story today and the headline was like the badge was going to be banned.
 
Crikey, can't believe how much traction this is getting. I'm sure slavery is the first thing anybody thinks of when they look at our badge?!!! If it is they're clearly a woke, jobsworth snowflake! You can twist most things to suit an agenda if you look and try hard enough.

What next? Ban the Arsenal badge because an individual is upset they discovered somebody died from cannon fire? How about ban the Brighton badge because seagulls keep shitting on my car and I think they're mocking me by having it on their shirt?
That made me splash the keyboard with some 1664 so deserves more than a like ;-)
But spot on Edghill
 
Crikey, can't believe how much traction this is getting. I'm sure slavery is the first thing anybody thinks of when they look at our badge?!!! If it is they're clearly a woke, jobsworth snowflake! You can twist most things to suit an agenda if you look and try hard enough.

What next? Ban the Arsenal badge because an individual is upset they discovered somebody died from cannon fire? How about ban the Brighton badge because seagulls keep shitting on my car and I think they're mocking me by having it on their shirt?
Perhaps someone has mentioned it already but didn't the original Chelsea FC badge have a Chelsea pensioner on it? Read it somewhere, and it's always possible that someone was having a bit of fun. But if it did have a pensioner what mileage could you get from that? I expect that it would offend someone retrospectively but I really cannot think how. Of course it could be the other way round: a retro reinstatement of the pensioner on a new Chelsea badge would be A Good Thing, showing the caring side of Chelsea FC.
 
Here is the alternative view. I wouldn’t normally quote The Sun as a reference in a history discussion but this article is actually well written.

Of particular interest is the bit where it states that the ships are thought to derive from the Manchester coat of arms, adopted in 1842, many years after slavery was outlawed in the British empire.

It looks like The Sun did their research whereas the “politcally correct” Guardian failed to do theirs.

 
yeah that "massive" boat all the kids piled on to and went round the lake.

Not a slave in sight and Lincolns statue was there.

"The Barnard statue was sent to Manchester on the strength of the support of local cotton workers for Lincoln, the Union and the abolition of slavery in the American Civil War. "
Yep the statue was there on the front near Wilmslow Road until the late 70s/early 80s iirc
 
Perhaps someone has mentioned it already but didn't the original Chelsea FC badge have a Chelsea pensioner on it? Read it somewhere, and it's always possible that someone was having a bit of fun. But if it did have a pensioner what mileage could you get from that? I expect that it would offend someone retrospectively but I really cannot think how. Of course it could be the other way round: a retro reinstatement of the pensioner on a new Chelsea badge would be A Good Thing, showing the caring side of Chelsea FC.

So they did, didn't know that. Wouldn't be safe reinstating that mate. It'd be construed as being ageist.

The red rose will be going next as somebody pricked their finger gardening.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.