Our Badge

So an image of a ship now automatically means slavery?

This article sounds like the guardian clutching at straws and trying to create a reaction.
They have gone through a period of self flagellation themselves in terms of benefiting from slavery and have pulled the rest of Manchester including the reds and us into their analysis. Whilst I didn’t agree with much of their conclusions, I didn’t see the article as a hatchet job.
 
They have gone through a period of self flagellation themselves in terms of benefiting from slavery and have pulled the rest of Manchester including the reds and us into their analysis. Whilst I didn’t agree with much of their conclusions, I didn’t see the article as a hatchet job.

You wake up one morning and decide that a cartoon ship was once a slave ship and that we should in some way be ashamed of that?

It's bollocks from top to bottom mate ;)
 
I thought this as well, but it turned out the ship on the Manchester coat of arms (1842) predates the canal by 50 years (opened 1894) which is pretty conclusive.

Why? Why is that conclusive. If I draw a ship now, it can relate to anything I want it to. The ship when it appeared on the club badge was after the canal was built, and after the period of slavery. And when it was used in 2016, it could literally have referred to anything the designers thought of.

People can have a view, and can link it or any other motif to many things. But one thing that is certain, no link can ever really be 'conclusive'.
 
You wake up one morning and decide that a cartoon ship was once a slave ship and that we should in some way be ashamed of that?

It's bollocks from top to bottom mate ;)
I didn’t and haven’t and aren’t.
I did read the article though.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.