Eli Panic said:Here's another. City 4 (Anelka 48, 68, 83, Tarnat 50), Villa 1 (Angel 31).Eli Panic said:Or 16/03/2008, City 2 (Ireland 59, Onuoha 61), Spurs 1 (Keane 32).Eli Panic said:How about 11/11/12, City 2 (Aguero 65, Dzeko 88), Spurs 1 (Caulker 21).
Hang on - he asks why people are slagging Pellegrini off in the first paragraph , in a manner suggesting a defence of the manager, then graphically answers that very question in the next two paragraphs!cleavers said:Good post is that :)Rösler von Stretfordbömber said:I am about certain that many of these posters just desperately hope to see an appalling, catastrophic result merely so they can come on here and slag Pellers for, what? Failure to be Roberto Mancini and failure to clone Jimmy Lad Milner four times and play them all in a packed midfield I guess.
That said, the man seems a class act and did a fantastic job last year. But seems to have utterly lacked a plan B to basically the same tactics being played against us all season.
And five Jimmy Lad Milners or not, the glacially slow tippy tappy sideways shite has not been working for a long time. Do I pretend to know what is the answer? No, because I am an internet poster. But someone sure as fuck needs to have an answer and an alternative approach because it like a depressing rerun week after week in watching us this year.
Cobwebcat said:Paul_Powers_Tash said:VOOMER said:We are getting exactly what we deserve. We have a great owner and that's about it. When Mancini was in charge we were organised and became winner's. He was judged on his CL record when every neutral journalist and pundit said we had the group of death twice. Didsbury Dave and other's slagged him of from the outset, but DD doesnt run the club. Where was our reaction when we saw a manager who has and will win more than Pellegrini, being fucked over the envious Khaldoon and two spivs from Barcelona? Nothing. We all seemed happy with the following notion that the players feelings were more important than having a well drilled team that will vary tactics and exploit opponents weaknesses. We still feel we shouldn't say, or do a thing because of our owner, but it isn't our owner is fucking it up. I'm sure that people are going to say get a grip, would throw that back and say we have got a grip of anything. We should have backed Mancini and bought two of his main targets and we would have likely been looking at 3 titles on the trot and a 4th this year. Instead we have a *anker for a DOF when therags have shown that the best way to go is the best manager you can find and back him to the hilt. We were happy pandering to the players sensitive nature's when they should have been told to shut the*uck up.
Absolutely spot on.
We are using United as the yardstick, really?
Moyes negates the manager argument. As for not pandering to players...Rooney?
kawkav said:Paul_Powers_Tash said:r.soleofsalford said:is there anyone in this entire forum who though having two up front with navas and clichy trying and failing to supply them was the right thing to do.
we should of started with milner and played one up front, and nasri instead of navas.
sack him now and put paddy in charge with brian kidd.
Nasri instead of Navas?? Are you having a laugh. Navas is far from good enough don't get me wrong but when was the last tine Nasri did anything. He's an absolute disgrace and should never have the privilege of pulling on that blue shirt ever again.
When Nasri is the solution I dread to think what the problem is!!
the only goal came off Nasri move
david whites spike said:Attacking move broke down beforehand because of who???citytill1die84 said:JustAnotherCityFan said:Fernandinho for giving a stupid foul away and Yaya for ducking his head when jumping in the wall.
Still why the fuck did he give him the whole goal to aim at?
His name begins with E.
The second goal wouldn't have happened if EDIN dzeko was a technically better footballer.the kind of forward top European clubs have.citytill1die84 said:david whites spike said:Attacking move broke down beforehand because of who???citytill1die84 said:Still why the fuck did he give him the whole goal to aim at?
His name begins with E.
What's that have to do with Hart giving Puncheon a full goal to aim at?