Barker said:
I'm also still interested to know what you guys think would have been a reasonable responds by Israel to the rockets from Gaza? Without getting into an argument.
I don't have an answer to this, not one I think you'll find acceptable.
However, what is clear is that this "tit-for-tat" warfare is never going to see an end to the violence. Everyone can see that.
Both countries have gotten so lost in the "he started it" rhetoric, that they have become typically myopic. Their need to get one over the other has usurped decency, and the citizens of both sides are victims. I extend the use of the word victims from wounding/death, to include the brainwashing that I believe occurred that allows even civilians to be so steadfast in their resolve towards warfare, citizens from both sides. I've met Israeli's who have denied that the walls surrounding the Palestinian territories exist, and I'm certain there are similar mind-sets in the west bank and Gaza.
Its 2014 now, well over 60 years since this conflict started. Throughout that time the true number of deaths and wounding and misery that both sides have brought upon the peoples of that region is huge. There are probably very few people left who were around when the country was annexed, yet the violence continues unabated. People say that corporate memory has a shelf-life; political memory apparently does not.
For this situation ever to be resolved it will take one party to make a concession. To publically announce, and commit to, a peace process that doesn't isolate, dehumanise, or exploit the other.
Now I know this doesn't say, how should Israel react. As I said my suggestion would not satisfy you, so I won't mention it for now.
However, first and foremost both sides need to find a way to stop tit-for-tat. If one side can not pull the trigger back, it would be a move in the right direction.