Paqueta Charged By The FA.

[Alan Harper's Tash]

His hearing is this summer god knows how long that takes

Yeah. If he is charged by the FA, he may well then be charged by the CPS too.

 

[Vienna_70]

Asked AI

As of the latest information available, Lucas Paquetá has been charged by the FA with alleged breaches of betting rules, specifically related to deliberately receiving yellow cards to affect betting outcomes. His hearing is scheduled for the summer of 2025. However, no verdict has been announced yet. The outcome of such cases can be influenced by various factors including evidence presented, legal arguments, and the specifics of the charges. Therefore, it's not possible to definitively predict whether he will be found guilty or not. The process is ongoing, and we will have to wait for the official hearing and verdict to know the result.

So AI is a glorified google?

 

[117 M34]

So AI is a glorified google?

I use chatgpt now instead of Google.
It searches the Internet for you and gives you all the information you need without having to click through various websites trying to find it

 

[Vienna_70]

I use chatgpt now instead of Google.
It searches the Internet for you and gives you all the information you need without having to click through various websites trying to find it

Cheers.

 

[halfcenturyup]

I use chatgpt now instead of Google.
It searches the Internet for you and gives you all the information you need without having to click through various websites trying to find it

Or having to use any intelligence of your own analysing what actual facts are available. God help us all.

Wait until Musk gets hold of it.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Or having to use any intelligence of your own analysing what actual facts are available. God help us all.

Wait until Musk gets hold of it.

Give it a decade or two, and people are having microchip implants in the brain.

 

[waspish]

So AI is a glorified google?

Yeah but better! So a simple thing to do is type in a recipe you want! Type in say carrot cake recipe it will just post recipe info pages for loads of websites! The better ones will generate videos photos

 

[East Level 2]

Give it a decade or two, and people are having microchip implants in the brain.

I thought we all had microchips included with the Covid vaccine.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

I thought we all had microchips included with the Covid vaccine.

They just gave those to the idiots but not a high enough strength to make any difference.

 

[flook]

So AI is a glorified google?

yes

 

[yozzerblue]

Give it a decade or two, and people are having microchip implants in the brain.

Already got wires in place, attached to a transmitter in my chest and terminals in brain. Stops my upper body and hands from trembling. Works a treat. 10 year battery life too.

 

[neel]

So AI is a glorified google?

Google can search , AI can generate , summarize , process , look up documents Google doesn’t have .

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Give it a decade or two, and people are having microchip implants in the brain.

We could have done with a couple of these being fitted last Monday to our back line and Eddie.

 

[waspish]

So AI is a glorified google?

Here is AI telling you your wrong

No, AI like me (Grok, built by xAI) is not exactly like Google Search. Here's a brief comparison:

- **Google Search** is primarily a search engine that indexes the web, allowing you to find information based on keywords. It retrieves links to websites, images, videos, news, etc., based on your query.

- **AI like Grok** is more about understanding and answering questions with context, often providing direct answers, explanations, or even opinions. I can:
- Process natural language to understand the intent behind your question.
- Provide information or insights without necessarily linking to external sources (though I can suggest searches if needed).
- Engage in a conversational manner, providing a more interactive experience.

While Google Search can give you the tools to find information, AI like me aims to synthesize information or offer direct assistance based on your queries, often with a touch of outside perspective on humanity. If you need to look up something specific or want to see a broad range of sources, Google Search would be the tool for that. If you want a more conversational, direct answer or need help understanding complex topics, then an AI like me would be more appropriate.

 

[EricBrooksGhost]

Here is AI telling you your wrong

No, AI like me (Grok, built by xAI) is not exactly like Google Search. Here's a brief comparison:

- **Google Search** is primarily a search engine that indexes the web, allowing you to find information based on keywords. It retrieves links to websites, images, videos, news, etc., based on your query.

- **AI like Grok** is more about understanding and answering questions with context, often providing direct answers, explanations, or even opinions. I can:
- Process natural language to understand the intent behind your question.
- Provide information or insights without necessarily linking to external sources (though I can suggest searches if needed).
- Engage in a conversational manner, providing a more interactive experience.

While Google Search can give you the tools to find information, AI like me aims to synthesize information or offer direct assistance based on your queries, often with a touch of outside perspective on humanity. If you need to look up something specific or want to see a broad range of sources, Google Search would be the tool for that. If you want a more conversational, direct answer or need help understanding complex topics, then an AI like me would be more appropriate.

"often with a touch of outside perspective on humanity. " It is generative and can create based on existing data and patterns; however it has no original thought, reasoning or logic. Powerful tool but that quoted line is bollocks.

 

[Franny 1234]

Talk about going off topic

 

[halfcenturyup]

Talk about going off topic

OK. This is what ChatGPT says about going off topic:

"Going off topic" refers to the act of diverting a discussion or conversation away from its main subject to unrelated matters. This can occur in various settings, such as meetings, online forums, or casual conversations, and often happens when someone introduces a subject that isn't pertinent to the current discussion. For example, during a meeting about project deadlines, if someone starts talking about their weekend plans, they are going off topic.

While staying on topic is generally preferred to maintain focus and coherence, occasionally veering off topic can lead to unexpected insights or help build rapport among participants. However, it's essential to be mindful of the context and ensure that such deviations don't hinder the primary objectives of the discussion.

In formal contexts, terms like "digressing" or "deviating from the subject" are used to describe going off topic. Conversely, in informal settings, phrases like "getting sidetracked" or "going off on a tangent" are common. Regardless of the terminology, it's crucial to recognize when a conversation has strayed and gently steer it back to the main subject to maintain productivity and clarity."

 

[BlueHammer85]

You can have him now, call it 60 mill.

 

[johnnytapia]

I thought we all had microchips included with the Covid vaccine.

 

[Franny 1234]

OK. This is what ChatGPT says about going off topic:

"Going off topic" refers to the act of diverting a discussion or conversation away from its main subject to unrelated matters. This can occur in various settings, such as meetings, online forums, or casual conversations, and often happens when someone introduces a subject that isn't pertinent to the current discussion. For example, during a meeting about project deadlines, if someone starts talking about their weekend plans, they are going off topic.

While staying on topic is generally preferred to maintain focus and coherence, occasionally veering off topic can lead to unexpected insights or help build rapport among participants. However, it's essential to be mindful of the context and ensure that such deviations don't hinder the primary objectives of the discussion.

In formal contexts, terms like "digressing" or "deviating from the subject" are used to describe going off topic. Conversely, in informal settings, phrases like "getting sidetracked" or "going off on a tangent" are common. Regardless of the terminology, it's crucial to recognize when a conversation has strayed and gently steer it back to the main subject to maintain productivity and clarity."

Thanks for the clarification