Parker agreed terms (or has he?) [Merged]

[Project]

Re: Parker agreed terms [Merged]

perhaps Zola gave them an ultimatum?

 

[bobmcfc]

Re: Parker agreed terms [Merged]

perhaps Zola gave them an ultimatum?

why have ssn been saying weve agreed terms with the player if (as it appears) we havent got permission from west ham ?


what if these two players are the "smokescreen" that Ajay was talking about ?

and how many will breath a sigh of relief if they are lol

 

[stonie]

Re: Parker agreed terms [Merged]

sever contact with westham and make no improved bid....no bigga deal

 

[johnny crossan]

Parker Not For Sale

According to offical response from West Ham Board spokesman (SSN)

 

[Halfpenny]

Re: Parker Not For Sale

Hope so.

 

[Petetheblu]

Re: Parker agreed terms [Merged]

Possible WHU have gotten wind of Hughes's demands on Sat after the forest game about him wanting players now and are trying to squeeze more out of the deal....Next!!!

 

[stonie]

Re: Parker agreed terms [Merged]

so much for quick impact transfers, i think the ADUG are gonna start to crack up too.. Welcome to the City rollercoaster boys!!!!

kiss my arse

 

[Blue4ever85]

Re: parker not for sale SSN

I hope this is true.

I really dont want Scott Parker at City. Simply because he isnt good enough.

 

[bluemoon32]

Re: parker not for sale SSN

I hope this is true.

I really dont want Scott Parker at City. Simply because he isnt good enough.

He isn't the 'star' player some would like but he's hugely better than Gelson or the German geriatric

 

[Blue4ever85]

Re: parker not for sale SSN

I hope this is true.

I really dont want Scott Parker at City. Simply because he isnt good enough.

He isn't the 'star' player some would like but he's hugely better than Gelson or the German geriatric

We're the richest club in the world and want to be the best. Signing Scott Parker would not achieve the latter.