hilts
Well-Known Member
My view is that we would have got Guardiola if we hadn't won the league in 2012 and were scared to sack Mancini, despite already knowing he was going to be a problem when Soriano and Begiristain came in. So we gave RM a new contract whereas we might have been less squeamish if the rags had won the title. I can completely understand that, with them having got a pasting over the Hughes signing, but it was a mistake in hindsight. But having done that, Mancini caused so much friction behind the scenes that the number one requirement was a manager who would work with, rather than against, the structure we wanted and would take the players with him rather than alienate most of them. We also needed one with a decent record in Europe because our CL performance in 2012/13 was embarrassing. The final requirement was a manager committed to attacking football.
You could say that MP has met all those requirements to some degree or other,. He has moved us forward in some ways but has taken us backwards in others. In pursuing attacking football, he's neglected the defence. In focusing on our game, he's neglected the the strengths and weaknesses of the opposition and doing the boring but necessary basic drills that teams need to have.
If this is true those running the club seem a bit spineless and dim tbh