Pep Guardiola - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
No it isn't. It never has been. No point reading the rest of what you've said if you're gonna lie in the first line.
He has clearly shown that with lesser players he struggles. The way he wants to play does require high quality players, not two in every position but mostly fantastic players. Something I always stuck up for him about when knocking he couldn't do it at a lower level ( we would never know) but this season and his first at City has shown them limitations for me.
 
So since Pep came and got an established squad together, you are saying we didn't have 2 great players for each position?
We all know Pep likes to manage a tight group of 15-18 players. Last I checked, 11 x 2 didn't equal somewhere between 15 and 18.
 
We all know Pep likes to manage a tight group of 15-18 players. Last I checked, 11 x 2 didn't equal somewhere between 15 and 18.

No,you get 10/10 on passing your maths test for the day, but apart from the LB position, we have had at least two players for every position in the team, until recent times.

It's you whose lying otherwise
 
He has clearly shown that with lesser players he struggles. The way he wants to play does require high quality players, not two in every position but mostly fantastic players. Something I always stuck up for him about when knocking he couldn't do it at a lower level ( we would never know) but this season and his first at City has shown them limitations for me.
Is this why we finished on 100 points and won the League Cup with Delph at left-back? And why we went on an 18-game winning run with Mangala playing several times? And why we won the domestic treble with Zinchenko in defence? And why we won the League Cup in 2020 with Bravo in net and then in 2021 with Steffen in goal?

And how we managed to win several league titles with the likes of Sterling, Jesus, and Grealish in the squad, who apparently nobody on this forum appears to rate? We won the treble in a year that Kalvin Phillips and Sergio Gomez played 44 games between them.

Don't give me this nonsense, man. As others have said, why do we need a thread on this forum complaining about the media coverage and false narratives about Pep and City when the things actual City fans say are far worse and more misguided. If a United fan said Pep couldn't do it at a lower level you'd blow your top, but here we are.
 
No,you get 10/10 on passing your maths test for the day, but apart from the LB position, we have had at least two players for every position in the team, until recent times.

It's you whose lying otherwise
If we have a squad of 15 to 18 players it is literally impossible for us to have "at least two players for every position".
 
Starting De Bruyne and bringing on Gundogan and Kovacic was suicide. Taking off Nico and Marmoush also just insane. He’d given up.

I’m not sure if it’s loyalty to his players, blind belief they’ll come good or whatever but he’s struggling to come to the same conclusion as everybody else, that some of our players are just absolutely finished and shouldn’t get a kick anymore.
It’s loyalty. He knows they’ve run their race and he also knows that we’ve got enough to finish top four, particularly given our more benign run in. However, rather than discard them and have them disgruntled at the training ground and then moaning in the press, he’ll keep them around and keep using them, more sparingly, until they’re no longer under contract. It’s the professional thing to do and also sets an example for the players who will be with us for the seasons ahead. Loyalty is a two-way street.
 
So since Pep came and got an established squad together, you are saying we didn't have 2 great players for each position?
If that was correct we would have had a squad of 22 world class players over the years and not a notoriously small squad starting players like Delph and Zinchenko.

Here’s a direct quote from Pep: "when people say they want two players for every position, I don't agree with that”.

We’ve always had a shallow bench, with 2/3 young players. How often have we had three keepers on the bench?
 
We all know Pep likes to manage a tight group of 15-18 players. Last I checked, 11 x 2 didn't equal somewhere between 15 and 18.
You’re quite right. The challenge now, however, is whether he can repeat the feat but with a larger squad (e.g. 22), many of whom are significantly younger than he’s had in previous squads and come with less experience. He’s acknowledged that we need a bigger squad, so he has an interesting personal challenge ahead.
 
You’re quite right. The challenge now, however, is whether he can repeat the feat but with a larger squad (e.g. 22), many of whom are significantly younger than he’s had in previous squads and come with less experience. He’s acknowledged that we need a bigger squad, so he has an interesting personal challenge ahead.
Yep. The way football is going, squads will need to be 25-30 players in size. Absolutely agreed that Pep now needs to switch up his methods, which is something he's acknowledged. Just not having it that we've "always had two players for every position" under Pep when 50% of this forum's traffic is people complaining that our squad is never big enough.
 
Is this why we finished on 100 points and won the League Cup with Delph at left-back? And why we went on an 18-game winning run with Mangala playing several times? And why we won the domestic treble with Zinchenko in defence? And why we won the League Cup in 2020 with Bravo in net and then in 2021 with Steffen in goal?

And how we managed to win several league titles with the likes of Sterling, Jesus, and Grealish in the squad, who apparently nobody on this forum appears to rate? We won the treble in a year that Kalvin Phillips and Sergio Gomez played 44 games between them.

Don't give me this nonsense, man. As others have said, why do we need a thread on this forum complaining about the media coverage and false narratives about Pep and City when the things actual City fans say are far worse and more misguided. If a United fan said Pep couldn't do it at a lower level you'd blow your top, but here we are.
I feel for you as you took a while to post that, whilst it is a very selective and one sided narrative (quoting one position out of 11) to support your wrong argument.

Your feelings are the only thing misguided here, blind loyalty which is admirable but happens from football fans who cannot objectively look at a situation without their clubs tinted specs on.
In my post I said "mostly" fantastic players. You can sneak through with the odd passenger. As he has shown this season though, he has become limited due to not having several of them fantastic players available. He deserves every credit for the success we have had, which we won't see again by the way but the man also deserves to be questioned when having a season like this. You fail to mention the early years he cost us in the CL. Gundog left mid at Anfield, fucking lol. Forget the CL final he single handedly lost us too, Lyon. We both can throw very selective bits of info out there but lets strip it all back and look at the facts.

His first year, the year Liverpool won it and this year, without the best players available we have looked really poor. Not one level down but several levels down so the question must be asked, why can't the best manager in the world get something out of this side when the chips are down, why do we consistently revert to type and trust the old guard who have been poor all season. Why can Foden's form drop off a cliff, why have we let so many quality young players go but persist with garbage like Lewis. He gets every plaudit when it goes well and rightly so, all of our success is down to him, on that same note when it goes tits up he is the man it stops with too. Our answer was to throw a couple of hundred mil at it in January and will probably do the same in the summer. It is probably needed of course but why in between that has the best manager in the world not found solutions to at least be competitive? We haven't beaten a top side since May 23, it is Feb 25 with no top sides left to play.
 
I feel for you as you took a while to post that, whilst it is a very selective and one sided narrative (quoting one position out of 11) to support your wrong argument.

Your feelings are the only thing misguided here, blind loyalty which is admirable but happens from football fans who cannot objectively look at a situation without their clubs tinted specs on.
In my post I said "mostly" fantastic players. You can sneak through with the odd passenger. As he has shown this season though, he has become limited due to not having several of them fantastic players available. He deserves every credit for the success we have had, which we won't see again by the way but the man also deserves to be questioned when having a season like this. You fail to mention the early years he cost us in the CL. Gundog left mid at Anfield, fucking lol. Forget the CL final he single handedly lost us too, Lyon. We both can throw very selective bits of info out there but lets strip it all back and look at the facts.

His first year, the year Liverpool won it and this year, without the best players available we have looked really poor. Not one level down but several levels down so the question must be asked, why can't the best manager in the world get something out of this side when the chips are down, why do we consistently revert to type and trust the old guard who have been poor all season. Why can Foden's form drop off a cliff, why have we let so many quality young players go but persist with garbage like Lewis. He gets every plaudit when it goes well and rightly so, all of our success is down to him, on that same note when it goes tits up he is the man it stops with too. Our answer was to throw a couple of hundred mil at it in January and will probably do the same in the summer. It is probably needed of course but why in between that has the best manager in the world not found solutions to at least be competitive? We haven't beaten a top side since May 23, it is Feb 25 with no top sides left to play.
I feel for you as it took a while to post that, but you've also gone with a very selective and one-sided narrative to support your wrong argument. You sound incredibly, incredibly spoiled to me. Not just a bit disappointed with how this season has gone, which is fair enough, but actively angry with Pep and some of the players, like City fans are entitled to trophies every single season over everyone else.

Specifically calling out two academy lads who've won the treble with us. Foden and Lewis. Shame on you.

When Pep leaves this club he will go down as our greatest ever manager and one of the greatest managers to ever come to England. He has changed what the words "Manchester City" mean on the global stage. He has changed English football to the point where kids on the park are now knocking it round the back with confidence. And when historians look back on how City fans regarded him, your post will be there, stinking like a bog.

If you'd told us all that when Pep came in he'd be here for 10 years, win 6x Premier Leagues (including a never done before four in a row), 2x (potentially 3x) FA Cups, 4x League Cups, and above all the European Cup, we'd have been delirious. But no, here you are, focusing instead on the times when City and Pep weren't absolutely perfect, as if perfection is something any football team can reach. As if human beings can just bend history to their needs without a challenge.

What a depressing way to look at football.
 
If that was correct we would have had a squad of 22 world class players over the years and not a notoriously small squad starting players like Delph and Zinchenko.

Here’s a direct quote from Pep: "when people say they want two players for every position, I don't agree with that”.

We’ve always had a shallow bench, with 2/3 young players. How often have we had three keepers on the bench?

He might not have agreed with that, but it's what he had for the first 5/6 years of his tenure.

Look back at the squad lists, and I ain't saying they were world class, but the fringe players would have walked into most Prem clubs starting 11 at the time.
 
I feel for you as it took a while to post that, but you've also gone with a very selective and one-sided narrative to support your wrong argument. You sound incredibly, incredibly spoiled to me. Not just a bit disappointed with how this season has gone, which is fair enough, but actively angry with Pep and some of the players, like City fans are entitled to trophies every single season over everyone else.

Specifically calling out two academy lads who've won the treble with us. Foden and Lewis. Shame on you.

When Pep leaves this club he will go down as our greatest ever manager and one of the greatest managers to ever come to England. He has changed what the words "Manchester City" mean on the global stage. He has changed English football to the point where kids on the park are now knocking it round the back with confidence. And when historians look back on how City fans regarded him, your post will be there, stinking like a bog.

If you'd told us all that when Pep came in he'd be here for 10 years, win 6x Premier Leagues (including a never done before four in a row), 2x (potentially 3x) FA Cups, 4x League Cups, and above all the European Cup, we'd have been delirious. But no, here you are, focusing instead on the times when City and Pep weren't absolutely perfect, as if perfection is something any football team can reach. As if human beings can just bend history to their needs without a challenge.

What a depressing way to look at football.
Spoilt, entitled, go the whole hog and complete the happy clapper bingo.

If you have read any other posts of mine you will have seen that yesterday I was fine with our performance, the heart and desire was there but the quality wasn't and we was beaten by the better team. That isn't demanding we win and be top every season is it, quite the opposite.

As you have shown in the Rico thread, you are a happy clapper who cannot see any criticism at the club, let me guess "let's not forget that in the nineties we was shite" Pep has been amazing for us, we won't win anything like we have again in my opinion. He, nearly alone deserves every single bit of credit for our success, but equally deserves to be questioned when he gets it wrong. Or is it just blind loyalty now? The man gets his name sung every game, banners made and supported through everything, even when he is calling us paying fans out for our attendance or noise levels. He gets that support no matter what, so on a City forum, during our worst season in a while, losing games more than we have in a very long time I think it is more than acceptable to ask questions from the best manager in the league. I don't think any of us could rest on past glories in our roles and take a year off and decline significantly. I don't want him gone either, just raising very fair questions. Yesterday was more like it, but still with a weird starting lineup and a boring slow build up to boot. I want to enjoy watching us again, that doesn't mean by winning, but by competing and being exciting to watch.
 
Two things I don't understand. Grealish was good in midfield vs. Forest, one of our best games all season. Why did Pep give up on him in that CM role?

Nunes isn't a FB but due to his pace and athleticism he was doing better than Lewis. Nunes wasn't great vs. Arsenal, but he hasn't started a game since then, including vs. Orient... Even though Lewis is more likely to stay at the club, currently Nunes seems to be the better option, especially going forward. Maybe Pep wants to play only those who will stay next season, plus some oldies due to their status and absence of good alternatives.
 
You’re quite right. The challenge now, however, is whether he can repeat the feat but with a larger squad (e.g. 22), many of whom are significantly younger than he’s had in previous squads and come with less experience. He’s acknowledged that we need a bigger squad, so he has an interesting personal challenge ahead.
I think it will help him having a younger squad

He seems to struggle with having to leave seasoned professionals out , which is why he never had to do this with a core of 18 players

The only players to miss out were kids , which he’s fine with

The issue will be getting young players of the requisite quality that will be first team ready

We’ve made a good start with this in January with Nico and Khusanov (maybe Reis)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top