PGMOL Apologise to Everton. It WAS a Penalty!

[VOOMER]

so the offside signal from Tierney was all in my mind???????

It was given, it was a free kick at the point where the offside call was made.

 

[Metalartin]

The new extra rhetoric is that even if it was offside, it was a different phase of play after Ederson saved the shot.

Wait, this is getting confusing. I thought that was the second offside shout... Which was spotted and given, since the ref waved play on after the handball shout.

Edit: Actually I see the argument. The only problem is. How can they dismiss an offside player caused Ederson to have to make a save which looped up and span awkwardly, causing the supposed handball? You can't.

 

[chaddblue]

Do we assume if VAR thought it was a penalty they would have then checked the offside which happened before?

100% that would have happened. They only review offsides if they lead to a goal or a pen. If the pen was given the second review would have been for Richarlisons offside and everything I've seen so far suggests he was off so the pen would have been overturned

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Wait, this is getting confusing. I thought that was the second offside shout... Which was spotted and given, since the ref waved play on after the handball shout.

Nope, like the Brighton penalty we conceded, it was deemed another phase in play.

I don’t know if it would have been here, but I have read people discussing it.

It REALLY doesn’t matter.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

100% that would have happened. They only review offsides if they lead to a goal or a pen. If the pen was given the second review would have been for Richarlisons offside and everything I've seen so far suggests he was off so the pen would have been overturned

Have a listen to the 93:20 pod review. They, like the rest of us, don’t know if the offside would have been given, and if it would have been deemed another phase of play.

It’s really not worth going round in circles on it.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Nope, like the Brighton penalty we conceded, it was deemed another phase in play.

I don’t know if it would have been here, but I have read people discussing it.

It REALLY doesn’t matter.

Even they couldn't have deemed it a different phase of play.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Even they couldn't have deemed it a different phase of play.

Why?

 

[kaz7]

And this is why we will get shafted the rest of the season , starting with olivar for the derby

 

[Metalartin]

Nope, like the Brighton penalty we conceded, it was deemed another phase in play.

I don’t know if it would have been here, but I have read people discussing it.

It REALLY doesn’t matter.

Nah, if an offside player latches onto a parried shot and scores, that's not a new phase of play. He's still offside. He shouldn't have been able to shoot after recieving the ball from an offside position in the first place.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Why?

The pass to the Brazilian was certainly part of the move but having said that they do make it up as they go along.