PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[jaiguruKun]

They are so blinded by hatred they cant see the wood from the trees.

When 10 000 leaked emails get compiled and presented in front of a neutral court, and the verdict is that there is no evidence owner funds were used disguised as sponsorship. You would think he would have the sense to maybe question the validity of the whole thing.

To be clinging to the charges that relate to us not answering the phone to be all you have at the end of it just makes him look ridiculous.

View attachment 75561

Can people stop giving this lunatic oxygen?

 

[M18CTID]

They are so blinded by hatred they cant see the wood from the trees.

When 10 000 leaked emails get compiled and presented in front of a neutral court, and the verdict is that there is no evidence owner funds were used disguised as sponsorship. You would think he would have the sense to maybe question the validity of the whole thing.

To be clinging to the charges that relate to us not answering the phone to be all you have at the end of it just makes him look ridiculous.

View attachment 75561

He truly is one desperate ****!

 

[Fordyboy46]

They are so blinded by hatred they cant see the wood from the trees.

When 10 000 leaked emails get compiled and presented in front of a neutral court, and the verdict is that there is no evidence owner funds were used disguised as sponsorship. You would think he would have the sense to maybe question the validity of the whole thing.

To be clinging to the charges that relate to us not answering the phone to be all you have at the end of it just makes him look ridiculous.

View attachment 75561

He's a horrible little woman isn't he

 

[Uwe Already]

Yep, I posted a while back in here that the charges are essentially the same to cover the rolling years of the supposed offences, and 95 per cent can already be dismissed.

The other five per cent is our only focus, but I don't know about this latest claim that it now boils down to one.

Sounds like a Chinese whisper being embellished around?

First rule of Chinese whispers club - nobody talks about tiny whiskers grub…

 

[Great Kompany]

A lot of verified journalist have been spouting nonsense from quite some time esp after the PL charges
Why City have not considered giving back to one of those - Nick Harris , Miguel Dalaney, Tebas and so on.

I just read a tweet from a guardian journalist which said it’s alright Arsenal drew to West Ham. They can’t win against this state sponsored 100 charges cheating team. Even when we are still on trial.

I guess when you don’t stop one, everyone piles on!

 

[dickie davies]

as this is clearly libel - WHY don't the club sue him? It needs to be stopped

Can we sue for someone using the word "cheating"

 

[lenno]

Manchester City are truly a unique club.

According to our rivals we're a shit team who only have success because we have bought the best players. Are assured that money does not equal success yet are criticised for 'buying' trophies with oil money. And are so weak that they hope these charges stick as it's the only way to stop our continued success.

Don’t forget, we don’t have fans. It’s all an illusion including this forum. Truly unique.

 

[CC1]

Can we sue for someone using the word "cheating"

It’s not the only incorrect statement in his tweet. So If we haven’t cheated & it’s damaging our brand - then yes. Ask Fox USA

 

[SebastianBlue]

as this is clearly libel - WHY don't the club sue him? It needs to be stopped

Because, unfortunately, suing him would just expand his platform. And would allow his legal team to undertake what would likely to be very malicious discovery.

 

[CC1]

Because, unfortunately, suing him would just expand his platform. And would allow his legal team to undertake what would likely to be very malicious discovery.

Yep. True. So bloody annoying though