PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[SilverFox2]

If our owners sold up today they'd probably walk away with anywhere between £500m and £1bn pure profit.

The "sportswashing" critics have always missed this basic point, and missed it so badly that it's blinded them to what is really happening at City.

The investment has been successful much to the red shirts dismay.
Our sponsors and whatever reason they had to back the owners investment must be delighted.

 

[Dannyblue52]

It obviously can't be 51-49 as there's only three of them but what I can guarantee with no proof whatsoever is that there will be no "tampering".

Long drawn out? Definitely, but I've got no worries on the result no matter how long it takes.

Absolutely. A balance of probability is based on the evidence provided.The Premier League must prove that their case is true and their information and documents must show that breaches of the rules actually occurred. This would be at odds with the certified accounts that the club will produce, so it is difficult to see how they can prove their case.

 

[bakerdave76]

Seriously, why post that. Does anyone actually care what some random dick on Twitter thinks?

Thought it had something to do with the situation we are in now .

 

[Brightwell Bros.]

The investment has been successful much to the red shirts dismay.
Our sponsors and whatever reason they had to back the owners investment must be delighted.

Like people moaning at the time about how much Yaya or Kev or Silva cost. You look back and you think what a bargain. The Etihad marketing lads must thank their stars they've got a direct in to the CFG, and some people think Etihad are doing the football team a favour.

 

[Winchester]

Thicko here...
Can someone explain
What bearing does the suspension jail sentence have on City and the FFP Situation now?

 

[bluemonkey71]

Thicko here...
Can someone explain
What bearing does the suspension jail sentence have on City and the FFP Situation now?

Zero

 

[Rory Bluelow]

Over 10 years ago I was wearing a City track suit top on a Sunday morning in Perth getting a lecture from some no mark Aussie ( Italian descent ) stranger who felt it was his business to tell me my clubs a disgrace & the ruination of football. His kids were in Rag kits.

He got told to fuck off!

I started seeing kids in City outnumbering other clubs & then the drip drip shithousery started & you stopped seeing the glory hunters jump on board. My kids suddenly getting called plastic despite being 4th generation blues from some **** who couldn’t point at Liverpool on a map.

This was always part of their strategy.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

The investment has been successful much to the red shirts dismay.
Our sponsors and whatever reason they had to back the owners investment must be delighted.

Example the CFA cost £200 to build hasn’t it raised over £400 million in transfer fees since it’s creation. So more than paid for itself. City are a supremely well run football club.

 

[Winchester]

Zero

Aha so I guess no further on really

 

[crazyg]

what I've said has nothing to do with "taking it on the chin". We will probably have to do even better than we did at CAS because the Prem have clearly gone for the jugular with us.

We don't know what the outcome will be. We are paying for the best lawyers but are facing a biased rather than independent committee.

We should have obtained the services of this barrister rather than Lord Pannick - he appears to be better suited if dealing with vampires:
Barrister Details - Mr Paul Richard Garlick KC - Bar …