Either they were not punished or it’s a new club, you can’t have it both ways.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Either they were not punished or it’s a new club, you can’t have it both ways.
The Everton case is complete bullshit.
The relegated clubs want Everton punished for breaking FFP after they got relegated.
But you can’t punish someone for a crime they hadn’t committed yet. Everton’s books were checked and were fine for the season in question (21/22).
The fact they broke FFP the next season is completely irrelevant.
I’d be pretty worried for our case if the independent panel side with the relegated sides.
Labour also support an independent regulator so it will probably happen eventually but not under this government
If Sunak was going to bring one in, he’d have announced it as part of the policy vomit during the conference where he just chucked any half baked ideas they had at the wall to see what stuck.
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,129
Either they were not punished or it’s a new club, you can’t have it both ways.
How's that?
Their club liquidated, a new club formed and duly started from the bottom tier of the senior pyramid. What's the punishment?
How's that?
Their club liquidated, a new club formed and duly started from the bottom tier of the senior pyramid. What's the punishment?
you’ve just explained how the punishment was either being dissolved or being relegated 4 tiers.
Wonder if this has any bearing on Pep being rather chipper in yesterday’s press conference : )
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,129
you’ve just explained how the punishment was either being dissolved or being relegated 4 tiers.
Liquidation isn't a punishment though? The footballing authorities have absolutely zero say in whether a business liquidates or not.
They were liquidated as a consequence of financial mismanagement which meant that they could no longer afford to survive.
I'm baffled that some are seeing any kind of similarities to our own predicament here.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
FFP is accessed Over 3 seasons with a limit on cumulative loss which in Everton’s case was 372m the limit being 105m Everton claimed that Covid was the reason for the excess yet it’s considerable more than any other club have claimed The clubs relegated last season are awaiting the outcome with compensation claims being consideredThe Everton case is complete bullshit.
The relegated clubs want Everton punished for breaking FFP after they got relegated.
But you can’t punish someone for a crime they hadn’t committed yet. Everton’s books were checked and were fine for the season in question (21/22).
The fact they broke FFP the next season is completely irrelevant.
I’d be pretty worried for our case if the independent panel side with the relegated sides.
FFP is accessed Over 3 seasons with a limit on cumulative loss which in Everton’s case was 372m the limit being 105m Everton claimed that Covid was the reason for the excess yet it’s considerable more than any other club have claimed The clubs relegated last season are awaiting the outcome with compensation claims being considered
it’s not happening.
They cleared FFP in 21/22. With the covid exceptions yes, but those were cleared.
The relegated clubs are upset that they failed the next season and think they should be entitled to compensation for a breach Everton hadn’t even made when they got relegated.
It’s not going to happen.
How would insiders at Everton know about our case?