The hacking was concealed from being investigated but Liverpool who had major power in the Premier league and why we need an independent regulator
Eevry time I hear this phrase "go nuclear" I am reminded of a meeting I went to with my partner about 20 years ago. We were in a serious legal dispute with some guys who were trying to take control of the shares of our company. We were in this meeting with a solicitor at Eversheds, a serious big hitter, and were talking about something like if they decided to withdraw cash without our consent or similar.
Anyway my partner confidently stated "If they do that we'll throw the book at them" and this solictor just casually but pointedly asked "What book?". She had no response.
I think this "go nuclear" phrase is the same: baseless bluster. There is no "nuclear".
He overpaidWhat was the price difference, out of interest?
City trying to establish a precedent for Statute of Limitations?
I think it would be very difficult to get the PL to revisit the hacking case, given that was settled between the clubs and is presumably time-barred anyway.
That makes sense. More likely to be used as evidence of bias, in our favour, than actually revisiting the matterIs this City throwing up evidence to support a case based around biased treatment against them?
Is there any chance you can show the rest of his tweets please mate? I don’t have a Twitter/X account so it’s not displaying his page when I click on it.