LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
We have lawyers who will eat to the bones of all charges, of that I have no doE
I agree with your EFC calcs, but we are facing a x 10 sanction, which if applied would easily lead to relegation. The cost of that plus loss of ECL revenue plus unimaginable compensation claims would run into hundreds of millions. The Everton ruling has changed everything, our next move will be an application to the High Court any day soon. The risks are too high to leave it to Richard Masters’s kangaroo court. We may as well spend the next Xmillion pounds on legal costs for a real court.I'm not sure where you get all this information from, but from what I've read, the PL recommended a punishment of 6 points, plus one additional point for each £5m expenditure above the threshold. To me that should be 6 points for a failing of £0-£5m, 7 points for £5m-£10m, 8 points for £10m-£15m, 9 points for £15m-£20m. Everton failed by £19.5m, so that's a 9 point points deduction recommended by the PL, from my understanding.
It could be argued that failing by £0-£5m should invite an additional point deduction, and each other band increasing by a point, resulting in a 10 point recommendation for Everton. I have read that the PL has guidelines for P&S failures, but these guidelines are not published in the PL Handbook, and I haven't found them published elsewhere.
The commission decided against using the PL recommendation, but applied is own sanction, which happens to be very similar to the recommended sanction.
This is in Section 13 of the Everton judgment document.
So I want to see the prospect of Richard Master’s facing the lawyers of Etihad Airaways etc in a court of Law and under oath explaining exactly what his compelling evidence of corruption actually is.
Last edited: