PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

Rosen has two. K and C.

Id be far more worried if they were B and M.

We have a wealth of top notch legal experts on here but fortunately they are on our side.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Rosen has two. K and C.

King of the C*nts ?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

King of the C*nts ?

Not sure if he’s the King, but if he’s a KC there’s a decent chance he’s a ****!

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Can you give an example of an organisation getting billions for reputational damage?

Although admittedly no legal expert, unlike most on here, I'd imagine an organisation would have to prove some quantifiable loss to gain any compensation. Other than a few ruffled feathers I can't imagine Etihad or others could actually present a viable case.

Several companies combined would amount to billions , not sure accusing your a company of being liars , fraudulent , dishonesty etc etc is among the ruffled feathers category, unless your a turkey voting for Xmas, like Everton did when they voted in favour of FFP

 

[pauls]

He also is part owner of a club that has had a massive owner investment, so he would be seen to be a massive hypocrite I guess he actually understands more than the average football pundit due to his Salford City involvement and his property empire

We all know his game,suggesting PL are bullies in picking on poor Everton, he even includes Stretford in the name checking along with us in suggesting they wouldn't touch the Big 6 when in reality he's hoping it stirs the corrupt league to get tough with us and Chelski.

 

[waspish]

Just read it. A brilliant article, but extremely depressing. Why are other journalists so blind? He sounds like he’s genuinely mourning the loss of professional football as we know it.

We know why the others are blind!! Click bait and bias towards there clubs they support

 

[Betterdeedthan red]

We are a major problem. To the fa's love affair with the rags and the dippers we will be removed one way or another.
Unfortunately I can't see anything other than relegation.
Not that I'd care no var or tourists

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Id be far more worried if they were B and M.

We have a wealth of top notch legal experts on here but fortunately they are on our side.

Who claims to be an expert? ,please point them out , what we do have are opinions , maybe informed or misinformed but still opinions that we are all entitled to on this forum.

 

[Bez]

Rosen has two. K and C.

King Crooked

 

[WRicko]

I think you are overreacting a tad here. We are in effect members of a private club - the PL - and we have to abide by their rules when we agree to be members. We can't go taking them to court because we don't agree with their rules. To change the rules, we would need to get a majority of fellow member clubs to agree with us and then propose a rule change.

We are at the stage of having been charged, and a commission has been appointed to look at the evidence. The next step could be years away, so there is no point worrying about it now.

I think your missing the point many legal and accounting experts on here have said several times that the accusations are in affect criminal though the Premier League have not explicitly stated as such I also haven’t seen any denials. This goes well beyond breaking the rules of the club. What’s more to prove breaking the rules they would probably need access to information they do not have from the other end I.e Etihad or to reinterpret the law around what is correct account practice e.g fair value and related party