urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,379
No seems like a paranoid social media rumour tbfIs there any truth in the rumour that the red shirts are helping the premier league with the legal costs?
No seems like a paranoid social media rumour tbfIs there any truth in the rumour that the red shirts are helping the premier league with the legal costs?
If this is true then how on earth was it only a 2:1 majority on the CAS panel and not unanimous?Yes, it was pure disbelief at UEFA’s stupidity. You can image our team turning to each other:
”What the fuck. Is that it???” “Really?” “What a joke.”
As the man said: ”I just don’t believe it.”
I expect the PL to prove just as assinine.
If this is true then how on earth was it only a 2:1 majority on the CAS panel and not unanimous?
Was asked in the pub last night by a Birmingham City fan. Told him it was all bullshit and there was no substance to the charges which seemed to accord with what he suspected. He certainly didn’t push back in any way.Twatter's usually the place for it but if you don't do Twatter you might not know. I would say that when engaging with opposition fans in person, I don't think a single one has ever brought it up. And I include United and Liverpool fans in that.
But remember they will also have lawyers who are fairly confident otherwise the charges wouldn’t be issuedWhat they risk is a reputation for incompetence and stubbornness which costs the member clubs money. This case could damage their credibility irreparably.
The opening paragraph:A reminder from Lord Pannick about taking on an almost certain losing case……
People think maybe I can sprinkle some magic dust on their cases – but some cases aren’t winnable. I spend much of my time saying, “Stop, you’ll lose.” Then I hear the words, “This is a matter of principle.” It’s the client’s prerogative. My role is to contribute to justice by making sure that the client’s side is fully argued.’
The essence of advocacy: Lord Pannick QC
In a rare interview, Lord Pannick QC, the barrister at the centre of some of the most critical legal debates this country has seen, reflects on his own role in the theatre of law, celebrates the art of persuasion and discusses his upcoming Hamlyn Lectures. Interview by Anthony Inglese CBwww.counselmagazine.co.uk
I would imagine for every KC that wins, there is a loser.
is absolutely on the fucking money.Advocacy depends as much on listening as on speaking. Listen to what the other side is saying, to what the judge is saying. Watch the body language. There’s no point in ignoring the concerns of the court. There has to be a conversation with the judge. Judges don’t want to be lectured to. They are concerned to get to the right answer, and they want the advocate to help them. Contrast this with advocates who target their clients as the audience (“Fantastic – you really told the judge!”). But the purpose is to persuade, so identify what is causing the judge concern.’
They've already presented them to CAS if not UEFA.Hacked emails can easily be doctored wait till city.produce the originals
united, livarpool, arsenal, spuds,Cartel charges confected from lies by thieves for racketeers whose sole aim is to destroy City.
line for the song?