PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

urban genie said:
We all know the bluster of claining it was 115 allegations of breaches was anounced dramatically because the independent commision was on it's way and the Prem wanted to look like they could be tough in house.

Since it has now become an albatros around their neck, too many spiteful journos and the wider footballing publc have had too much time to generate an imagined guilt and and anger at the lack of decision and punishment (even if nowt is yet proved)

If we win none will acceept it is anything but the league bottling it or corruption.
If we lose then the strictest punishment will be demanded, if we are just fined or a minor points deduction the prem will be accused of bottling it or corruption.

Win or Lose the prem have fucked themselves, plus if we win the damages to our reputation (we will always be seen as bent as it is ingrained in public minds now) mean we should rinse the premier league for damages
Click to expand...
Public minds in the UK...and that's unfortunate...outside of the UK City are mainly admired and at a minimum looked upon as a footballing juggernaut..
With the few exceptions like that fat little old fuck in Spain the majority of the world could either give two fucks or see the Prem as this strange, greedy entity hell bent on destroying its marquee club.

Has anyone else considered this scenario? City get relegated. The also rans then fight it out for the title. For argument's sake Arsenal finish first. They will ALWAYS have to hear the only reason you were able to win is because City were removed from the league. With City there you couldn't win jack shit. Pull out the asterisks. And to the remaining "contenders" it's even worse. Even with City out of the league you couldn't win, LMAO.

A point deduction for City would be even worse for these assholes. Let's say City get docked 15 to 20 points and finish 10 points off the top. How would the league "winners" be perceived then? And worse yet for those dickheads we'd still most likely finish top 4 or 5. It would be ManUre's worst nightmare as they would suffer the embarrassment of finishing below us having been spotted 20 points.

I don't anticipate any of these things happening, but it does provide food for thought. How desperate and shameless do you need to be to try and take something earned on the pitch through corrupt backroom dealings and political influence. If you're a nag, removing the thoroughbred won't make you a thoroughbred, but it might make you the big nag among nags. Have fun with that...
 
KS55 said:
I used to know the late Rudy Narayan QC. He was a shouter who lost case after case by putting the judges back up. His classic was to argue that all cases of blackmail were racist by virtue of the name. He actually argued this as a defence in one case. Verdict: Guilty as charged.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a sinfully shit advocate.
 
halfcenturyup said:
I am pretty sure the club's defence will be presented in the most professional manner and at the right time and won't take into account what idiots are saying on the internet.
Click to expand...
Setting our evidence out in public as well as in the process will surely help. If we don’t we will be accused of cheating even if 100 % cleared. You might not care what rival fans etc think and I imagine City don’t but they do care about the brand and the companies accused of being in on it surely care about here image
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.