PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Maly]

The media would cite public interest as a reason and CAS, governed by Swiss Law, agreed.

Any idea how stolen emails would be viewed under UK law? Admissible or not?

 

[Father Paul]

And they have ZERO witnesses to these alleged frauds. Not ex managers, support staff, tea lady, the likes of Garry Cook, Yaya Toure and Dimitri Seluk (who went on record saying there were no dodgy payments).

They have nothing, but will still find us guilty and kick us out of the league - who's going to stop them? No one.

They can't do that even though they may wish they could also if they issue any punishment which is too severe it is my understanding that this can be appealed to the High Court.

 

[Chi-town blues]

And this story is three years old and since then Pinto has been found guilty of extortion, got a four years suspended jail sentence in Spain, a sixth-month suspended sentence in France, and has been charged with 377 more offences. I am not sure he would be a credible witness!

A thief is only a credible witness for his own crime.

 

[eyalluvitt]

and Liverpool (cleared by UEFA for some strange reason but we all know they did fail)

Failed by 60m but wrote it off as stadium expansion evaluation costs, which was of course accepted by a fair and impartial PL

 

[eyalluvitt]

Not the PL. Their dispute was with the EFL and they eventually settled with them a couple of years after winning the PL title. Fact is though, the whole episode of them breaching Championship FFP never got any widespread coverage in the media. I think The Guardian were the only ones to ever report on it. After all, the wider media were never going to write any negative articles about their fairytale title winners.

Fast forward to today and rumours abound that Leicester are going to sue Everton. If there’s any truth in that then it’s a fucking piss-take. Perhaps the clubs Leicester got promoted at the expense of can sue Leicester as well.

I once had an annoying Korean neighbour called Suemi, so I did

 

[Paladin]

I once had an annoying Korean neighbour called Suemi, so I did

I had one called Sam Sung.

 

[jim tolmies perm]

I had one called Sam Sung.

Did you sue him for his ingratiating voice?

 

[Centurions]

That an email is confidential so how can someone steal it and use it against you.
Why does every email have this confidentiality contained so therefore making it inadmissible?

Just adding that at the bottom of anything doesn't make it legally binding, that would be up to a court to decide.

 

[Centurions]

They are trying to prove concealment or fraud, in which events the Limitation Act would not apply.

I'm still puzzled that if that is the case then why haven't they passed it on to the SFO as it's way beyond the PLs remit.

 

[WRicko]

I'm still puzzled that if that is the case then why haven't they passed it on to the SFO as it's way beyond the PLs remit.

Plus surely that have legal requirement to report