You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Dribble
Well-Known Member
Where does leave us. Baffled
The PL are struggling to redefine FFP/PSR in a way that it continues to stop another City from happening, but doesn't affect the Scousers, ArseAnal, ManUre or their faithful lapdogs Spuds.
After spending 10 years labeling City as FFP cheats, it's killing our detractors who're now waking up to what FFP's all about, but who STILL can't drag themselves away from the anti-City cheats narrative.
A better question would be, why feel sorrow & empathy for Everton & Forest, whilst continuing to want the destruction of City?
Hammering Everton & Forest, then changing FFP rules immediately after just adds to the utter bullshit of the FFP we warned the sporting world about.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
My understanding is the PL are like the Dibble. They've investigated & accused us of breaching their FFP rules, then handed over their evidence to the Adjudicatory Panel (the local beak) to hear the case & issue a verdict & potential punishment if applicable.Need to check to clear up an argument
Have we actually been charged with anything?
Or, as I believe, the PL have made a number of allegations that will be heard by an independent commission who will then advise the PL if there are grounds to actually issue charges?
Last edited:
abu13
Well-Known Member
I heard on the radio that Forest will arge that they could have been much closer to the PSR if they had sold a particular player in June of last year, however they held off until July and recieved a fee of about £3million more.
As such they have done the best for the long term future of the club but also fucked themselves by the regulations, it's obsene what the PL are trying to do with these rules.
As such they have done the best for the long term future of the club but also fucked themselves by the regulations, it's obsene what the PL are trying to do with these rules.
bitterblue78
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 1,229
How can’t people understand that charges for 1/2 things is going to take a lot less time than dealing with 115 different charges when the 1/2 pled guilty & the 115 rejected the claim & has to be investigate further. You’d think it would be REALLY obvious but apparently not
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,421
How can’t people understand that charges for 1/2 things is going to take a lot less time than dealing with 115 different charges when the 1/2 pled guilty & the 115 rejected the claim & has to be investigate further. You’d think it would be REALLY obvious but apparently not
They understand it…… they just don’t ask the right questions like….
Why didn’t they just try us for 1 or 2 like Everton & Forest?
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
I doubt most understand, they just see FFP / FSR and assume that City have broke it 115 times Very few have looked into the charges or what they maybe. Not one of our charges as a stand alone charge amount to anywhere near what Everton were accused of they breached FSR to maintain their PL status ate the expense of other clubs they then lied amount loans being for the stadium and also claimed many time more in Covid losses than the next a highestThey understand it…… they just don’t ask the right questions like….
Why didn’t they just try us for 1 or 2 like Everton & Forest?
Of the 115 we are accused of in fact breakdown to 5 on multiple years
ganganvince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 6,645
That is pretty much my understanding and if the lead charge of deception falls all the others apart from non co operation fall with itI doubt most understand, they just see FFP / FSR and assume that City have broke it 115 times Very few have looked into the charges or what they maybe. Not one of our charges as a stand alone charge amount to anywhere near what Everton were accused of they breached FSR to maintain their PL status ate the expense of other clubs they then lied amount loans being for the stadium and also claimed many time more in Covid losses than the next a highest
Of the 115 we are accused of in fact breakdown to 5 on multiple years
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,929
Where does leave us. Baffled
In no different a place. Not sure what point Keys and Grey think they’re making, it doesn’t matter if they change the rules at the end of the season. Clubs are charged related to rule breaches in a particular season, not against whatever rules are in place at the point of the charge.
Keys and Gray are just 2 shit stirring know newts. That's the point they're making. C#nts the pair of themIn no different a place. Not sure what point Keys and Grey think they’re making, it doesn’t matter if they change the rules at the end of the season. Clubs are charged related to rule breaches in a particular season, not against whatever rules are in place at the point of the charge.