PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

That would be the logical conclusion of these conspiracy theories. First we bribed the Judges at CAS, then we bribed all our Senior Execs , sponsors, and Auditors. Then we bribed the PL's indpendent panel of Judges. So we have bribed hundreds of people. Why didn't we just bribe Ceferin and Richard Masters and his pals? It would have saved us a lot of time and money.
We also bribed Pep and Haaland
 
I saw a tweet from Magic Twat (who I think claimed to be an accountant) responding to a question about our latest signings by saying that we'd write these off in the financial year and take the hit, rather than amortise them over the length of the contract.

Now one of the main charges against us is that we presented accounts that didn't comply with the relevant regulations and accounting standards (presumably to do with allegations around not declaring related parties and categorising what should have been owner investment as revenue). If MagicTwat really was an accountant (clue: he's not, he's a failed journalist) but if he was, then he'd know about IAS 38/FRS 102, which cover accounting for intangible assets.

Player contracts used to be written off in the year of purchase but for many years have been classed as intangible assets and therefore the required accounting treatment is to amortise them over the life of the contract. By writing off in a single year, we would be guilty of not producing accounts that meet accepted accounting standards. So he's definitely not an accountant as he claims. That simply hardens the conviction that he's Nick Harris.

I've not engaged with him so far as I've no wish to and find his deranged bleatings quite amusing but I'm tempted to on this and get blocked.

1737116817544.gif
 
This week, former Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp admitted that he has told his old players to book a flight to his holiday home in Mallorca if City are found guilty of their Premier League charges and they will hold a parade in his garden to celebrate (even though the charges do not refer to any season where Klopp would get a retrospective Premier League winners' medal himself if any of City's titles were stripped).

-/-/-/-/-

Classless cunts gotta be classless cunts!

If any **** deserves thousands of the fuckers in his villa it’s this goofy fucker.
 
Joined 2 weeks ago sniff sniff
Sniff sniff should lead to an automatic ban. Just have a quick flick through their previous posts and talk of games attended in years gone by. Just because they don't say what you want to hear doesn't make them not a blue. Only thing sadder than someone coming on pretending to be a blue, is the adult blues on the internet sniff sniffing people. Yes I am aware your boring reply to me will be sniff snuff.

Haaland news can only be positive though surely for the case, he wouldn't commit to that otherwise surely. It is only going to ramp up in the coming weeks, it's like the traitors where we are looking out for any evidence haha
 
This twat needs shutting down. The club should throw the book at him

I would be amazed if the club even knew of his existence, outside of a few office workers who are on BM or Twitter.

He’s an absolute nobody. 18k followers.

There’s parody accounts of fictional cartoon characters with 100x the follower count.

It would be like a blue whale sending a cease and desist to a single plankton stuck in its teeth.

The only thing that should happen is that BM posters stop giving a no mark attention seeker the attention he wants.
 
I saw a tweet from Magic Twat (who I think claimed to be an accountant) responding to a question about our latest signings by saying that we'd write these off in the financial year and take the hit, rather than amortise them over the length of the contract.

Now one of the main charges against us is that we presented accounts that didn't comply with the relevant regulations and accounting standards (presumably to do with allegations around not declaring related parties and categorising what should have been owner investment as revenue). If MagicTwat really was an accountant (clue: he's not, he's a failed journalist) but if he was, then he'd know about IAS 38/FRS 102, which cover accounting for intangible assets.

Player contracts used to be written off in the year of purchase but for many years have been classed as intangible assets and therefore the required accounting treatment is to amortise them over the life of the contract. By writing off in a single year, we would be guilty of not producing accounts that meet accepted accounting standards. So he's definitely not an accountant as he claims. That simply hardens the conviction that he's Nick Harris.

I've not engaged with him so far as I've no wish to and find his deranged bleatings quite amusing but I'm tempted to on this and get blocked.

Reel him in.
Begin intrigued, curious, ask a few questions that make him feel important, trap him, then whoosh, do it.
 
I saw a tweet from Magic Twat (who I think claimed to be an accountant) responding to a question about our latest signings by saying that we'd write these off in the financial year and take the hit, rather than amortise them over the length of the contract.

Now one of the main charges against us is that we presented accounts that didn't comply with the relevant regulations and accounting standards (presumably to do with allegations around not declaring related parties and categorising what should have been owner investment as revenue). If MagicTwat really was an accountant (clue: he's not, he's a failed journalist) but if he was, then he'd know about IAS 38/FRS 102, which cover accounting for intangible assets.

Player contracts used to be written off in the year of purchase but for many years have been classed as intangible assets and therefore the required accounting treatment is to amortise them over the life of the contract. By writing off in a single year, we would be guilty of not producing accounts that meet accepted accounting standards. So he's definitely not an accountant as he claims. That simply hardens the conviction that he's Nick Harris.

I've not engaged with him so far as I've no wish to and find his deranged bleatings quite amusing but I'm tempted to on this and get blocked.
Don’t give the idiot a single nanosecond of thought. Whoever he/she is they are a nobody who is likely to lose his/her mind if the 115 charges come to nothing .
Nothing more than the bitter ramblings of a gob shite
 
Sniff sniff should lead to an automatic ban. Just have a quick flick through their previous posts and talk of games attended in years gone by. Just because they don't say what you want to hear doesn't make them not a blue. Only thing sadder than someone coming on pretending to be a blue, is the adult blues on the internet sniff sniffing people. Yes I am aware your boring reply to me will be sniff snuff.

Haaland news can only be positive though surely for the case, he wouldn't commit to that otherwise surely. It is only going to ramp up in the coming weeks, it's like the traitors where we are looking out for any evidence haha
Sad snuff ?
 
If a relegation caused by a club breaking the rules leads to financial losses for a player, it provides grounds for the player to seek contract termination through FIFA. Therefore, if you refuse to let players leave, there is a significant risk you will lose them for free. That's a can of worms no club wants to open.
Should your user name be Family Man Ryan?
 
If a relegation caused by a club breaking the rules leads to financial losses for a player, it provides grounds for the player to seek contract termination through FIFA. Therefore, if you refuse to let players leave, there is a significant risk you will lose them for free. That's a can of worms no club wants to open.
your whatbaoutery is tedious and would be more suited to the comments section on the BBC, what about if you wrote an intelligent, cogent , factual reply instead of blithering nonsense that has a massively limited scope of happening just to create a negative narrative?
 
If a relegation caused by a club breaking the rules leads to financial losses for a player, it provides grounds for the player to seek contract termination through FIFA. Therefore, if you refuse to let players leave, there is a significant risk you will lose them for free. That's a can of worms no club wants to open.
Admit it. You’re really hurting this morning aren’t you,chief?

You’ve held into the hope for years and now you can see it, feel it almost, being taken away from you inexorably.

Your club is shit and you can no longer hide behind the strawman of big, bad, City.

And it is glorious.

You red ****.
 
What are the specific grounds via FIFA? You can’t just make a bare assertion without particularising the ground which you are citing. ‘Through FIFA’ is meaningless.
If the relegation affects a player's salary and other income, or if it prevents the player from participating in a tournament the team had qualified for, players can file a complaint with FIFA’s Dispute Resolution Chamber. If the complaint is successful, they can either terminate their contracts and become free agents or receive compensation.
 
If the relegation affects a player's salary and other income, or if it prevents the player from participating in a tournament the team had qualified for, players can file a complaint with FIFA’s Dispute Resolution Chamber. If the complaint is successful, they can either terminate their contracts and become free agents or receive compensation.
What’s the specific provision within FIFA rules for this?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top