PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

journolud said:
Embarrassed himself and his club with his ignorance, set up or not. Anyone but a simpleton could understand the difference between our situation and theirs and for the removal of all doubt you would think clubs would have their legal teams analyse things and brief their employees.

He may well be hoping for some short term gain but he along with every other one eyed nobhead is going to look a **** when the verdict is passed.
Click to expand...
The reality is they are making hay whilst the sun shines, they all know there are huge differences but they also know it plays well to say one rule for them and one for us even when comparing apples and oranges. This was the whole point of this smear campaign, a year in and still going strong.
 
journolud said:
Embarrassed himself and his club with his ignorance, set up or not. Anyone but a simpleton could understand the difference between our situation and theirs and for the removal of all doubt you would think clubs would have their legal teams analyse things and brief their employees.

He may well be hoping for some short term gain but he along with every other one eyed nobhead is going to look a **** when the verdict is passed.
Click to expand...
The funny thing is that he - like every other fucker - only ever wants to ask why City haven't been deducted points or dealt with as quickly as Everton.

However the more logical and relevant question especially for Dyche is "why have Everton been deducted points and Forest haven't?"

I have yet to see that question asked anywhere, let alone seen an answer.

Both have been charged under (presumably) the same rules for (presumably) the same time period yet Everton have had points deducted immediately and Forest are only above them in the table because they haven't. That is what should be concerning Gravel bonce, not sticking his nose into something he admits he doesn't understand.

Of course there may be some sensible explanation, but as far as I can see it's about as clear and transparent as VAR .
 
Eebo said:
The funny thing is that he - like every other fucker - only ever wants to ask why City haven't been deducted points or dealt with as quickly as Everton.

However the more logical and relevant question especially for Dyche is "why have Everton been deducted points and Forest haven't?"

I have yet to see that question asked anywhere, let alone seen an answer.

Both have been charged under (presumably) the same rules for (presumably) the same time period yet Everton have had points deducted immediately and Forest are only above them in the table because they haven't. That is what should be concerning Gravel bonce, not sticking his nose into something he admits he doesn't understand.

Of course there may be some sensible explanation, but as far as I can see it's about as clear and transparent as VAR .
Click to expand...
Are you being serious?
 
Eebo said:
The funny thing is that he - like every other fucker - only ever wants to ask why City haven't been deducted points or dealt with as quickly as Everton.

However the more logical and relevant question especially for Dyche is "why have Everton been deducted points and Forest haven't?"

I have yet to see that question asked anywhere, let alone seen an answer.

Both have been charged under (presumably) the same rules for (presumably) the same time period yet Everton have had points deducted immediately and Forest are only above them in the table because they haven't. That is what should be concerning Gravel bonce, not sticking his nose into something he admits he doesn't understand.

Of course there may be some sensible explanation, but as far as I can see it's about as clear and transparent as VAR .
Click to expand...

Or your 1 charge took 5/6 months why do YOU think 115 charges are not been dealt with yet!

His reaction be this!
giphy.gif
 
Eebo said:
Yeah why? What do you know that I don't?
Click to expand...
Everton and Notts Forest have to present their defence to an independent commission in a couple of months then if found guilty they'll be punished. Everton current points deduction was for last season they're most likely to get another points deduction in April together with Notts Forest at the same time
 
BerkshireBlue said:
Everton and Notts Forest have to present their defence to an independent commission in a couple of months then if found guilty they'll be punished. Everton current points deduction was for last season they're most likely to get another points deduction in April together with Notts Forest at the same time
Click to expand...
You know, I really hadn't realised Everton had broken the rules twice.

Fuck, that it is quite an achievement to be so crap even after cheating for two years in a row.

Meanwhile because City have been so good it means we must have cheated despite our audited accounts showing we haven't broken the rules?

On the one hand the team that actually cheated two years in a row is absolute crap, but a team with no evidence of cheating against them must have cheated because it is so good - some weird logic going on there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.