You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
RobinHood
Well-Known Member
Ha ha - I had to Google that, hope you haven't got it in your personal photo library!You beat me by 0.35 of a second.
journolud
Well-Known Member
He could have at least skimmed the threadTypical plasterer wants everyone to do work for them :)
Record gates all the way back.Do you think we'll fill the place in the National League?
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,613
- Team supported
- Manchester City
A few Brighton fans asked us about the charges and what's going to happen. We all said City are 100% innocent.
They said but 115 charges ad innocent ! We explained its basically 5 charges and the pl are accusing some very high up people like a prince, depty prime minister, top people in numerous companies of 10 years of fraud.
Once it was explained their view changed, we explained its the 3 red tops +1 who want to control the pl.
Most fans just believe the scum press/media
They said but 115 charges ad innocent ! We explained its basically 5 charges and the pl are accusing some very high up people like a prince, depty prime minister, top people in numerous companies of 10 years of fraud.
Once it was explained their view changed, we explained its the 3 red tops +1 who want to control the pl.
Most fans just believe the scum press/media
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,606
Looking at the time those tweets were sent, I’ll lay a pound to a pinch of shit that the **** was into his third gram of gear when he posted them.
Hope the ****’s arse is going this morning.
It’s times like this I miss the News of the worlds fake sheik.
I think they must enjoin the panel not to be swayed by all the negative press but just stick to the evidence. This dossier might be part of that.Surely Tolmie's information isn't that groundbreaking and could mean 1 of 2 things.
A) The club are, in the event of a not guilty verdict, likely to take legal action against perhaps a number of journalists or media personalities
B) The club are simply preparing a defence/appeal with regards to a guilty verdict and perhaps using an avenue of external pressure on the IC as grounds for this.
Just standard practice, I would assume.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
Is “He was quite a character” code for he was a bullshitter and an absolute wanker.Someone else has mentioned that before.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Off topic perhaps but why on earth would anyone watch GB News in the first place?Some berk on GB News this morning posing as a sports reporter spitting out his anti city agenda. This really needs to be stopped. We're in the public stocks with every tosser throwing rotten vegetables at us.
arcademik70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 68
Just from an optics point of view I don't see how we won't be found guilty of non compliance and long grass at three very least. I think the media will have an out that says guilty of 30 odd charges and that'll be enough. The stupid out there will just hear guilty and the detail will be irrelevant. That's why I think we need to be really aggressive on the "cheat", front.