PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[LongsightM13]

Blinkered crackpots, please.

Haha he only used the vowel in his latest tweet

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

He says there are no letters and we’re all crackpots

He's got a point on the latter, tbf.

 

[ayrshire_blue]

Blinkered crackpots, please.

Always fascinating when the actual crackpot thinks that everyone else are crackpots. Bless.

 

[Damocles]

He says there are no letters and we’re all crackpots

I no longer take the piss out of Nick Harris because I'm legitimately concerned about his mental health.

 

[cheekybids]

I no longer take the piss out of Nick Harris because I'm legitimately concerned about his mental health.

Has anyone heard from him lately. The last was his meltdown after his Twitter spat with Stefan then nothing.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I no longer take the piss out of Nick Harris because I'm legitimately concerned about his mental health.

Are you really that concerned? Aren’t there more exigent and worthwhile things to be concerned about?

 

[OB1]

Tell

Old news but it was going to involve a City striker going the other way until Spurs Manager pulled the plug.

 

[Uwe Already]

Who's this Sue you speak of and where's she going?

Sue Nami-of-boiling-piss?

 

[blue for life]

He’s coming up with a shite song as we speak

Haven’t heard about that Tosser for years

 

[BeerIsTheBest]

I'm confident about my information that the PL want some sort of settlement.

@gordondaviesmoustache has talked about the use of the phrase "...will be resolved..." alluding to a settlement rather than going full speed ahead with a hearing based on a weak case.

Alberto Galassi's interview also suggests that the club feels it's on the verge of a successful outcome.

And I've always been confident and maintained these alleged breaches are very weak, and have either been rejected by CAS or considered not worth bothering with by UEFA.

It's also possible that the IC has come to the conclusion that these breaches aren't considered fraudulent and therefore outside the statutory 6- year limit under UK law.

Encouraging and thanks I will sleep a title sounder on your post.
if you’re right then I guess a major consideration is the stance of our guys on the intensity of the potential ‘pinch.’
We took a sharp one a few years ago and intamated we would never do so again!
Die in a ditch territory or pragmatic resolution……In these situations who really wins if one side is pounded into the dirt?