carlosthejackal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,510
Really ?So no letters?
Why is Stefan so quiet?
Really ?So no letters?
Why is Stefan so quiet?
FFS Jordan wiped the floor with Stefan.
Stefan is too slow to think and react in a real time environment.
I hope he doesn't go on again to 'defend' us because let's be honest he's no match for that fast talking **** Jordan.
Objective information is the important thing most fans get from him.I have read the FAQ and every post on this thread and your Twitter offerings since you started going on Talksport.
I know you're not on there to defend City you're on there to self promote.
The reason I thought you might defend City is that I thought you were a City fan.
When it came to discuss City on that show today, Jordan understood what was required of him (to stick the boot in) and he had you on toast.
As I now know you're not on to defend City, I'll pass next time you announce on Twitter and Bluemoon that "I'm on Talksport" today.
There's nothing objective about Talksport, Dim Jim and Simon the Pseud.Objective information is the important thing most fans get from him.
What was it you were expecting ? He only goes on and states facts while Jordan looks for clickbait. Fact is we are accused of fraud,there are 115 charges, there is nothing to argue.I have read the FAQ and every post on this thread and your Twitter offerings since you started going on Talksport.
I know you're not on there to defend City you're on there to self promote.
The reason I thought you might defend City is that I thought you were a City fan.
When it came to discuss City on that show today, Jordan understood what was required of him (to stick the boot in) and he had you on toast.
As I now know you're not on to defend City, I'll pass next time you announce on Twitter and Bluemoon that "I'm on Talksport" today.
TBF you might as well have just sent Jordan the FAQs, debating is irrelevant.I’m not on to defend City and not sure why you think I would. In any event, City have been accused of fraud and cooking the books. If you don’t understand that, you should read the FAQ
I'm expecting quick obvious responses to Simon Jordan's loud interjections. Embarrassing performance, no wonder they keep asking him back on, it makes they're job of belittling our club so much easier.What was it you were expecting ? He only goes on and states facts while Jordan looks for clickbait. Fact is we are accused of fraud,there are 115 charges, there is nothing to argue.
YawnI have read the FAQ and every post on this thread and your Twitter offerings since you started going on Talksport.
I know you're not on there to defend City you're on there to self promote.
The reason I thought you might defend City is that I thought you were a City fan.
When it came to discuss City on that show today, Jordan understood what was required of him (to stick the boot in) and he had you on toast.
As I now know you're not on to defend City, I'll pass next time you announce on Twitter and Bluemoon that "I'm on Talksport" today.
The price of football podcast announced the premier league spent £20 million on lawyers last season. That's more like Amazon than a cottage industry.Really? I didn’t get a winner/loser vibe from that discussion one way or the other. Most of the talk was about the amount of legal resource available to the two parties. Dickhead made his usual yawn inducing jibe about City running a cottage industry for lawyers, whilst Stefan pointed out there were leading KC’s working for all parties.
As to the legal letters, Stefan made it pretty clear that he regarded Goldbridge as a fundamentally untrustworthy chaser of clicks, and that was about it.