halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,127
Being our most venomous critic is not the legal test though. It’s whether it’s untrue and defamatory - and from a practical point of view worth the mither. It’s why I (erroneously it seems) thought Goldbridge might have had one. Because he’s said things that are defamatory (imo) and he has a huge profile.
But just because he hasn’t had one doesn’t mean others haven’t. It’s ultimately a judgement call for the club based on a number of factors, but do I think it’s perfectly plausible some types of warning have been sent - yes I do.
Did he ever say he hadn't got one? Or was he just advised, maybe, not to publicise it?