It makes you think, in the day and age where a company can face legal action for misgendering someone, will we ever look to push for racial discrimination charges against both the Premier League and main media outlets, as most of the allegations and stories reside around the sentiment that. 'it must be dodgy because they're in middle east'It certainly has a whiff doesn’t it.
"Magically...City have a wage bill of £423million and 520 employees compared with Liverpool’s wage bill of £373million and 1,005 employees"
Who does he think those extra employees are? They're not going to be players on £400k a week. They'll almost certainly be catering staff and cleaners, that will come under another budget at City, and who would hardly make a dent in that wage bill. Anyone with half a brain can work out just how many part time low paid workers you can employ for a few million a year.
In case he needs help:
500 people costing £40k a year (so a reasonable full-time wage, with employer on costs) = £20m
1 player on £385k a week = £20m
Given that many of those 500 are likely to be low paid and part time, you could probably pay most of them with Sergio Gomez's wages.
It's fucking embarrassing that this kind of stuff gets into a national newspaper, and that level of maths from a man who studied PPE at Oxford is just shocking.
No chance.It makes you think, in the day and age where a company can face legal action for misgendering someone, will we ever look to push for racial discrimination charges against both the Premier League and main media outlets
(four of their top ten sponsors are linked to the UAE, including the stadium and shirt sponsor Etihad)
So that means the majority of the club’s main sponsors aren’t linked to the UAE.
Therefore, if these non-UAE sponsorships are in line with the UAE-linked sponsors then they must be fair value/legitimate.
Syed has clearly started writing the article thinking “I’ll include the fact all City’s sponsors are UAE linked, ha ha ha, gotcha!”
He’s then looked at the data and it hasn’t told him what he wanted it to. Yet he’s forged on ahead with that angle regardless, which is just the height of laziness.
if you’re going to have a pop at discrediting the club at the least put a bit effort in.
A lamentable article, but unsurprising given it’s been written by a failed table tennis player.
There’s an old but very true mantra….At the risk of outing myself as thick as fuck, I struggle with the notion that preposterous charges have been brought by the EPL who must have sought the advice of competent lawyers before they did so. Genuine question to you - do you believe the EPL lawyers are thick as fuck also, or is it the case that the charges were issued by the EPL against legal advice?
For what it’s worth I trust Khaldoon‘s irrefutable evidence statement but as I say it seems virtually unthinkable that any responsible organisation would issue proceedings of such magnitude knowing such proceedings were doomed to fail
Surely they have the right or they wouldnt have charged us with non - co operation..
Not sure where I saw it but Stefan was calling Goldbrudges bluff re: letters sent out.When was that mate I must've missed it?
Magically, City pay their staff decent wages instead of being cheapskates who fuck over their employees. The guy must love Walmart - they employ vast numbers of people on shit money as well."Magically...City have a wage bill of £423million and 520 employees compared with Liverpool’s wage bill of £373million and 1,005 employees"
If a few were sent out to a small of particular targets how would that impact on the wider media?I think it’s pretty clear the letters weren’t sent. The coverage has been worse since weekend.
Cheers.Not sure where I saw it but Stefan was calling Goldbrudges bluff re: letters sent out.
He said at that time the club had sent no letters.
Some may have been sent out since then, mind you,