The poorly drafted initial letter from the PL bringing the charges was evidence to me that they hadn't spent a lot of time on the matter and had just hastily pulled something together. The looming announcement about an independent football regulator might have had something to do with that.
A call from Mr Levy and his pals to say "we are going to have to back this IFR if you don't take action" was probably enough to provoke it.
The only doubt I have ever had is simply down to the 2-1 vote from CAS. That shows we don't have irrefutable evidence and that UEFA did convince one judge to agree with their case, and we failed to convince them otherwise.
Will it be possible for the PL to twist that 2-1 in their favour? Probably not, but it has been the only nagging doubt I have had.
What I would say, is the fact CAS did ultimately clear us is substantial evidence at our PL hearing. Judges don't tend to undermine one another, so they would need a lot more convincing to shift positions on matters CAS were ultimately comfortable with....not sure what your thoughts are on this?