There is a Light
Well-Known Member
Why block everyone though, when they’d also be a good source for his rants?Not really imo - it's a very good source of the fuel for his many rants.
Why block everyone though, when they’d also be a good source for his rants?Not really imo - it's a very good source of the fuel for his many rants.
Because they're pointing out the flaws in his arguments?Why block everyone though, when they’d also be a good source for his rants?
Don't forget that Harris also wanted Rabin's details as wellHarris wants the guys details just so he can discredit him.
Whether the guy is right, wrong etc is irrelevant- why should he give Harris his details!
Like he tried to do the Stefan when he handed him his arse on a plate
Guy seems to have an issue with anyone having an opinion (guilty or not guilty) if it isn’t him
If your reading this nick as we know you do
You are a prick!
Pat Jennings was in court for the opening of Peter Sutckiffe’s murder trial. Of no relevance whatsoever to this thread but worthy of sharing to those who are unaware of this rather unusual fact.He’s not even as good as Pat Jennings.
Isn't an Harris another name for a minge in some quarters?
I'm sure a woman I was seeing from Salford yrs ago called hers an Harris on occasion
Shit, I must of been in the wrong hole."get off your harris" isn't that backside?
Still fits though.
Finally got round to listening to the Harris/Stefan podcast and I was quite shocked to hear how little Harris knew about the 115 charges. He really, really wanted to talk about fair value, wanted to imply they were back on the table now, and had very little sense of how the whole thing was going to play out. This was only recently so has had plenty of time to get his head round the CAS case and listen to a bunch of stakeholders and experts on the details (as best we can work out) re: the IC. Really quite taken aback by how little detail he had given this is his life's work: there's a bunch of journos who have a better grasp (for, against, neutral). Weird.