Can't wait for all the outrage when they hear about the earnings and prize money we could receive from next year's WCC.
They all ready know that is and Chelsea will receive arojnd €50m just for entering it
Can't wait for all the outrage when they hear about the earnings and prize money we could receive from next year's WCC.
Top post blue.A Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
Those facts should be posted/engraved all around the stadium.A Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
You don’t say much Tim but when you do it’s worth listening.A Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
A Liverpool fan I work with had absolutely no idea that we had an era of winning trophies in the late 60’s / early 70’s. He thought that the current era was the first time we have won thingsA Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
And don't let them forget that Arsenal only got into the top flight in the first place by bribing officials. They really won't talk about that.A Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
A Liverpool fan in work?A Liverpool fan in work said the same thing to me. He said that City were a yo-yo club through our entire history. I told him that only Everton, Liverpool, United, Villa, and Arsenal have spent more time combined in the top flight league than City. United have only spent 4 years more combined than City in the top flight. If not for our late 1990s relegation craziness, then City would still to this day have been in more top flight seasons than United.
United spent nearly exactly half their pre world war II existence in the second tier of football. That's a fact that they don't talk about.
City spent most of their time pre world war II finishing above United. (City = 28 United = 15)
Liverpool spent a decade following world war II in the second tier, and only escaped after getting their own sugar daddy, again something that their fans don't like talking about.
City won the FA Cup 4 years before United and 61 years before Liverpool.
City won the League Cup 22 years before United and 4 years before Liverpool.
City were the 4th English team (Spurs-> West Ham -> United -> City) to win a European trophy via a UEFA tournament 3 years before Liverpool won a UEFA tournament
Rival fans who pretend that City were a Wycombe style rising, just don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're pathetic and jealous. They think that it hold themselves up as being great by trying to tear others down, ignoring the fact that they usually use incorrect information, or are straight up knowingly lying about what they're saying.
Fuck them.
Timbobs obviously works in the benefits office.A Liverpool fan in work?
Hubcaps recycling plant.A Liverpool fan in work?
Timbobs, but funny nonetheless.Big Joe obviously works in the benefits office.