In some circumstances yes and that is one
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
bigA
Well-Known Member
Meanwhile Scruffy Jim gets a surprise visit on his yacht moored on the Manchester Ship CanalAsk him if he has any idea why the rags file their accounts in the offshore tax-haven Cayman Islands, or why UEFA fined them last year, or why HMRC is currently investigating them.
Other than a successful smear campaign which our club must not get involved in, we'll win with facts in the courts... Where's there any evidence of 100% mission accomplished.You are not going to change and why should you? Unfortunately the sustained vitriolic media campaign against our club has been a huge success. The average football fan believes what they see and hear on SKY Sports and talkSPORT. To me, that’s why the clubs strategy of radio silence has been a huge mistake. If the club don’t even refute or challenge it then why would people not believe it to be true? Regardless of the outcome of the 115 charges we will always be seen as cheats and our achievements and reputation forever tarnished. To be fair the red cartel clubs in cahoots with the PL have achieved exactly what they set out to do on this front. It’s 100% mission accomplished.
The enemy will win the odd battle, they won't win the war.
Trust your club, they haven't let us down yet.
Satan oscillate my metallic sonatasYou mean Metal?
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Some cretin at Walking Football today interrupted a bit of back and forth good natured jibes I had with a mate with "City are corrupt" shite. I couldn't let it go. Its not in my DNA. When I asked him to prove it he had no answer except to say "look at who your owners are". He wasn't having it, even when I said what good work they'd done and put money INTO football rather than take it out. What about our owners? It's the colour of their skin isn't it. Brown = guilty in their narrow minds. No concept of innocent unless proven guilty. Unfortunately in today's era of dog-whistle politics, racism whether its blatant, or poorly disguised is all too apparent.
I'm happy to defend our club for what it's worth, but I'm also telling myself that you can't argue with an idiot. I'm 60 next year and probably should know better but I'm probably not going to change.
Walking football? Was McPointalot on form?
P
P
PPT
Guest
Saw that twat today at Chester Races. Strutting about in a suit jacket at least two sizes to small. He’s in a syndicate that has a horse running there tomorrow called ‘Box To Box’ which is more than he ever did when he pulled on a City shirt.Walking football? Was McPointalot on form?
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Saw that twat today at Chester Races. Strutting about in a suit jacket at least two sizes to small. He’s in a syndicate that has a horse running there tomorrow called ‘Box To Box’ which is more than he ever did when he pulled on a City shirt.
Should’ve named it Pointing at Fuck All.
Of all the wankers we have signed over the years and there has been a lot .Should’ve named it Pointing at Fuck All.
This twat is top of the tree , hated him at the time and even more so now ,
Striking Viking tomorrow York I thinkSaw that twat today at Chester Races. Strutting about in a suit jacket at least two sizes to small. He’s in a syndicate that has a horse running there tomorrow called ‘Box To Box’ which is more than he ever did when he pulled on a City shirt.
Mr.Banks
Well-Known Member
I would have thought his horse would be a point to pointer.Saw that twat today at Chester Races. Strutting about in a suit jacket at least two sizes to small. He’s in a syndicate that has a horse running there tomorrow called ‘Box To Box’ which is more than he ever did when he pulled on a City shirt.