PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It’s funny the media describes Pinto as a whistleblower & Assange as a hacker….
A whistleblower doesn't demand money from organisations not to blow the whistle. Pinto was cauaght bang to rights and now faces more than 300 other charges. He admitted attempted extortion in court in return for a suspended jail sentence. The coverage in the UK media has been dishonest and distorted from day one.
 
A whistleblower doesn't demand money from organisations not to blow the whistle. Pinto was cauaght bang to rights and now faces more than 300 other charges. He admitted attempted extortion in court in return for a suspended jail sentence. The coverage in the UK media has been dishonest and distorted from day one.
Did you expect anything else? Gutter press.
 
Sounds like keeping the smear campaign going knowing they will lose the case going forward saying we have all this evidence but carnt use it as its deemed illegal obtained so we know city are guilty but carnt prove it crap
This was the PR strategy used by UEFA to get themselves off the hook for their failed case and it worked for them. They continued to brief the media using third parties that they had done their best but the offences were either time-barred or just impossible to prosecute beause of City's refusal to co-operate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrb
This was the PR strategy used by UEFA to get themselves off the hook for their failed case and it worked for them. They continued to brief the media using third parties that they had done their best but the offences were either time-barred or just impossible to prosecute beause of City's refusal to co-operate.

Otherwise known as damage limitation.
 
So he's provided German and French authorities these files but also says:

"'We haven't released the information yet but we have a massive file of Manchester City-related documents that has yet to be released."

So he has released them technically and City's lawyers should be able to get hold of them, to see if he's posturing for attention or not.

This is probably what they are going to do if City win the case. Every time someone claims they have evidence that's not been seen before, they'll drag the club's name through the mud again and demand another investigation. If they are allowed to keep doing that, it will be disgrace... clear and organised. There has to be an end to it.
 
So he's provided German and French authorities these files but also says:

"'We haven't released the information yet but we have a massive file of Manchester City-related documents that has yet to be released."

So he has released them technically and City's lawyers should be able to get hold of them, to see if he's posturing for attention or not.

This is probably what they are going to do if City win the case. Every time someone claims they have evidence that's not been seen before, they'll drag the club's name through the mud again and demand another investigation. If they are allowed to keep doing that, it will be disgrace... clear and organised. There has to be an end to it.

Why hasn’t he given the PL those new illegally hacked files? Surely if he did that and the PL won the case on the back of those illegally hacked files, he would be vindicated? No?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.