Also amazing that no other clubs have had these systems hacked, clubs that file accounts in the Cayman Islands to avoid UK Tax scrutiny.How many fckin emails do City employees send?
Also amazing that no other clubs have had these systems hacked, clubs that file accounts in the Cayman Islands to avoid UK Tax scrutiny.How many fckin emails do City employees send?
Probably because he'd had a payoff from other parties to hack on request.As far as I'm aware he's never asked us for money, it was Doyen Sport he was trying to shake down. He has defrauded a Caymans(?) bank previously so he's had experience.
Edited for accuracyMagic Hat
We know you pop you’re head into our forum, but seriously, you’re being butchered with every post you make, think of your mental health
Here’s Samaritans number 116 123.
you’ll have someone who can listen to your mad man diatribes.
I have a small job in a small organisation and I send thousands every year.How many fckin emails do City employees send?
Don’t worry, the police will take an age to catch up with you.I have a small job in a small organisation and I send thousands every year.
Their doubling down puts Putin and Maga to shame...So he's provided German and French authorities these files but also says:
"'We haven't released the information yet but we have a massive file of Manchester City-related documents that has yet to be released."
So he has released them technically and City's lawyers should be able to get hold of them, to see if he's posturing for attention or not.
This is probably what they are going to do if City win the case. Every time someone claims they have evidence that's not been seen before, they'll drag the club's name through the mud again and demand another investigation. If they are allowed to keep doing that, it will be disgrace... clear and organised. There has to be an end to it.
11(5) , lack of imagination on the writer of the article.Why is it '5 hard drives' worth of evidence. Why not 4. Or 6. Or 1? Sounds a nice round high number
also didnt they say it was something like 3.4tb of evidence, why would you store 3.4tb on 5 drives, it makes 0 sense, western digital do a pocket size portable hard drive for 100 quid that store 4tb or intenso do one that stores 5 tb for a similar price, so unless he has another 300 million documents up his sleeves (give or take) the 5 hard drives makes no sense.Why is it '5 hard drives' worth of evidence. Why not 4. Or 6. Or 1? Sounds a nice round high number